Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: atmel_ssc_dai: fix spelling mistake: "Stoping" -> "Stopping"
From: Colin Ian King
Date: Wed Apr 04 2018 - 06:41:31 EST
On 04/04/18 11:24, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:45:40PM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 04:44:20PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Hello Colin,
>>
>>> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in pr_debug message text
>>
>> would you mind making this patch a bit less non-trivial and
>> change pr_debug to dev_dbg dropping Atmel_ssc_dai prefix?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>
> Trivial patches should just be trivial instead of evolving into a thread
> that lasts for days.
Yep, this feels like this scenario for sure.
>
> I sometimes write trivial clean up patches for things like:
>
> arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c:97 do_csum() warn: inconsistent indenting
> 88 /* last up to 7 8byte blocks */
> 89 count %= 8;
> 90 while (count) {
> 91 asm("addq %1,%0\n\t"
> 92 "adcq %2,%0\n"
> 93 : "=r" (result)
> 94 : "m" (*(unsigned long *)buff),
> 95 "r" (zero), "0" (result));
> 96 --count;
> 97 buff += 8;
> 98 }
>
> Why is "buff += 8;" indented too far? And why does every line end in a
> space character? And I think about it for 10 minutes and then delete my
> patch because it's too much hassle to deal with for something small.
Same here. Hence stuff never gets fixed.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>