Re: [PATCH v4] x86,sched: allow topologies where NUMA nodes share an LLC

[Tim Chen]

On 04/03/2018 02:12 PM, Alison Schofield wrote:

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * topology_sane() considers LLCs that span NUMA nodes to be
> +	 * insane and will display a warning message. Bypass the call
> +	 * to topology_sane() for snc_cpu's to avoid that warning.
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (!topology_same_node(c, o) && x86_match_cpu(snc_cpu)) {
> +		/* Indicate that package has NUMA nodes inside: */
> +		x86_has_numa_in_package = true;

Why does the x86_has_numa_in_package has to be set here when it would have
been done later in set_cpu_sibling_map?

> +
> +		/*
> +		 * false means 'c' does not share the LLC of 'o'.
> +		 * Note: this decision gets reflected all the way
> +		 * out to userspace.
> +		 */
> +
> +		return false;

Thanks.

Tim