Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: at91: Fix for PLL set_rate changes not being actually written to PLL peripheral bits
From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Tue Apr 10 2018 - 04:32:21 EST
Hi Marcin,
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 20:16:49 -0400
Marcin Ziemianowicz <marcin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When a USB device is connected to the USB host port on the SAM9N12 then
> you get "-62" error which seems to indicate USB replies from the device
> are timing out. Looking around, I saw the USB bus was running at half
> speed. Going further, it seems that in ..._set_rate() the PLL wasn't
> actually being adjusted. Writing the multiplier and divider values to
> the peripheral fixes the bus running at half speed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Ziemianowicz <marcin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> index 534961766ae5..db7155fe9346 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> @@ -288,6 +288,14 @@ static int clk_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> pll->div = div;
> pll->mul = mul;
>
> + // Set the PLL as per above div and mil values.
^ mul
Please do not use C++-style comments, use /* comment */ instead.
> + regmap_update_bits(pll->regmap, AT91_CKGR_PLLBR,
You hardcode the PLL ID here. What if this function if called for PLLA?
> + AT91_PMC_DIV | AT91_PMC_MUL,
You should use PLL_MUL_MASK(layout) and PLL_DIV_MASK to do that.
> + (div << 0) | (mul << 16));
This is wrong. The clk has the CLK_SET_RATE_GATE set, which means the
rate cannot be updated if the PLL is not gated, and if you look at
clk_pll_prepare(), you'll see that div and mul fields are updated
there. Now, maybe there's a bug in clk_pll_prepare(), but
clk_pll_set_rate() is definitely not the place where we want ->div and
->mul to be written to the register.
> +
> + pr_debug("clk-pll: setting new rate, (%lu hz / %u) * %u = %lu hz\n",
> + parent_rate, div, mul, rate);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Regards,
Boris