On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:54:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:19:31 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Oh, might_sleep with a comment explaining it's for the future sounds
Andrew, were your questions answered? If yes could I bother you for an ack on this?Still not very happy that readers are told that "this function may
sleep" when it clearly doesn't do so. If we wish to be able to change
it to sleep in the future then that should be mentioned. And even put a
might_sleep() in there, to catch people who didn't read the comments...
Otherwise it looks OK.
good to me. I queued this - Wei, could you post a patch on top pls?