Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: export hugetlb page allocation counts

[Jonathan Helman]

On 04/10/2018 08:12 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018å04æ10æ 05:11, Jonathan Helman wrote:
> > On 03/22/2018 07:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018å03æ22æ 11:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On 2018å03æ20æ 12:26, Jonathan Helman wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Jason Wang<jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>Â wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2018å03æ20æ 06:14, Jonathan Helman wrote:
> > > > > > > > Export the number of successful and failed hugetlb page
> > > > > > > > allocations via the virtio balloon driver. These 2 counts
> > > > > > > > come directly from the vm_events HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC and
> > > > > > > > HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC_FAIL.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Helman<jonathan.helman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > ÂÂ drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.cÂÂÂÂ | 6 ++++++
> > > > > > > > ÂÂ include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h | 4 +++-
> > > > > > > > ÂÂ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c 
> > > > > > > > b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > > > > > > > index dfe5684..6b237e3 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -272,6 +272,12 @@ static unsigned int 
> > > > > > > > update_balloon_stats(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
> > > > > > > > ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ pages_to_bytes(events[PSWPOUT]));
> > > > > > > > ÂÂÂÂÂÂ update_stat(vb, idx++, VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_MAJFLT, 
> > > > > > > > events[PGMAJFAULT]);
> > > > > > > > ÂÂÂÂÂÂ update_stat(vb, idx++, VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_MINFLT, 
> > > > > > > > events[PGFAULT]);
> > > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> > > > > > > > +ÂÂÂ update_stat(vb, idx++, VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_HTLB_PGALLOC,
> > > > > > > > +ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ events[HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC]);
> > > > > > > > +ÂÂÂ update_stat(vb, idx++, VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_HTLB_PGFAIL,
> > > > > > > > +ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ events[HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC_FAIL]);
> > > > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > > > ÂÂ #endif
> > > > > > > > ÂÂÂÂÂÂ update_stat(vb, idx++, VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_MEMFREE,
> > > > > > > > ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ pages_to_bytes(i.freeram));
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h 
> > > > > > > > b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h
> > > > > > > > index 4e8b830..40297a3 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h
> > > > > > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h
> > > > > > > > @@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ struct virtio_balloon_config {
> > > > > > > > ÂÂ #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_MEMTOTÂÂ 5ÂÂ /* Total amount of 
> > > > > > > > memory */
> > > > > > > > ÂÂ #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_AVAILÂÂÂ 6ÂÂ /* Available memory as 
> > > > > > > > in /proc */
> > > > > > > > ÂÂ #define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_CACHESÂÂ 7ÂÂ /* Disk caches */
> > > > > > > > -#define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NRÂÂÂÂÂÂ 8
> > > > > > > > +#define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_HTLB_PGALLOCÂ 8Â /* Hugetlb page 
> > > > > > > > allocations */
> > > > > > > > +#define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_HTLB_PGFAILÂÂ 9Â /* Hugetlb page 
> > > > > > > > allocation failures */
> > > > > > > > +#define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NRÂÂÂÂÂÂ 10
> > > > > > > > ÂÂÂÂ /*
> > > > > > > > ÂÂÂ * Memory statistics structure.
> > > > > > > Not for this patch, but it looks to me that exporting such nr 
> > > > > > > through uapi is fragile.
> > > > > > Sorry, can you explain what you mean here?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jon
> > > > > Spec said "Within an output buffer submitted to the statsq, the 
> > > > > device MUST
> > > > > ignore entries with tag values that it does not recognize". So 
> > > > > exporting
> > > > > VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NR seems useless and device implementation can not 
> > > > > depend
> > > > > on such number in uapi.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > Suggestions? I don't like to break build for people ...
> > >
> > > Didn't have a good idea. But maybe we should keep VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NR 
> > > unchanged, and add a comment here.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > I think Jason's comment is for a future patch. Didn't see this patch 
> > get applied, so wondering if it could be.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jon
>
> Hi Jon:
>
> Have you tested new driver with old qemu?

Yes, this testing scenario looks good. Thanks.

Jon

> Thanks