Re: [PATCH] docs: kernel-parameters.txt: Fix whitespace

[Thymo van Beers]

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 02:08:46PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:45:01 +0200
> Thymo van Beers <thymovanbeers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Some lines used spaces instead of tabs at line start.
> > This can cause mangled lines in editors due to inconsistency.
> > 
> > Replace spaces for tabs where appropriate.
> 
> Seems like a fine idea.  The patch doesn't apply, though; can you please
> make a version against current docs-next?  (Or against 4.17-rc1 will work
> too).
> 
> Also...
> 
> >  			domain
> > -			  Isolate from the general SMP balancing and scheduling
> > -			  algorithms. Note that performing domain isolation this way
> > -			  is irreversible: it's not possible to bring back a CPU to
> > -			  the domains once isolated through isolcpus. It's strongly
> > -			  advised to use cpusets instead to disable scheduler load
> > -			  balancing through the "cpuset.sched_load_balance" file.
> > -			  It offers a much more flexible interface where CPUs can
> > -			  move in and out of an isolated set anytime.
> > -
> > -			  You can move a process onto or off an "isolated" CPU via
> > -			  the CPU affinity syscalls or cpuset.
> > -			  <cpu number> begins at 0 and the maximum value is
> > -			  "number of CPUs in system - 1".
> > +				Isolate from the general SMP balancing and scheduling
> > +				algorithms. Note that performing domain isolation this way
> > +				is irreversible: it's not possible to bring back a CPU to
> > +				the domains once isolated through isolcpus. It's strongly
> > +				advised to use cpusets instead to disable scheduler load
> > +				balancing through the "cpuset.sched_load_balance" file.
> > +				It offers a much more flexible interface where CPUs can
> > +				move in and out of an isolated set anytime.
> > +
> > +			You can move a process onto or off an "isolated" CPU via
> > +			the CPU affinity syscalls or cpuset.
> > +			<cpu number> begins at 0 and the maximum value is
> > +			"number of CPUs in system - 1".
> 
> This would appear to have changed the indentation of some of the text?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon

Thanks for the comment.

I will rebase against docs-next. Hadn't realised my tree wasn't
up-to-date.

Upon reviewing that section I see that was intentional indentation and
not some tab/space mix up.

Both will be fixed in v2.

- Thymo