Re: [PATCH] net: don't use kvzalloc for DMA memory

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:05:54AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/18/2018 07:34 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > The patch 74d332c13b21 changes alloc_netdev_mqs to use vzalloc if kzalloc
> > fails (later patches change it to kvzalloc).
> > 
> > The problem with this is that if the vzalloc function is actually used, 
> > virtio_net doesn't work (because it expects that the extra memory should 
> > be accessible with DMA-API and memory allocated with vzalloc isn't).
> > 
> > This patch changes it back to kzalloc and adds a warning if the allocated
> > size is too large (the allocation is unreliable in this case).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 74d332c13b21 ("net: extend net_device allocation to vmalloc()")
> > 
> > ---
> >  net/core/dev.c |    3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6/net/core/dev.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/net/core/dev.c	2018-04-16 21:08:36.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6/net/core/dev.c	2018-04-18 16:24:43.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -8366,7 +8366,8 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int
> >  	/* ensure 32-byte alignment of whole construct */
> >  	alloc_size += NETDEV_ALIGN - 1;
> >  
> > -	p = kvzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
> > +	WARN_ON(alloc_size > PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER);
> > +	p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
> >  	if (!p)
> >  		return NULL;
> >  
> > 
> 
> Since when a net_device needs to be in DMA zone ???

It's likely that we are not the only device like this.
It would be better to find a way to find devices like this.

Imagine you want to pass some data to card.
Natural thing is to just put it in a variable and start DMA.
However DMA API disallows stack access nowdays,
so it's natural to put this within struct device.

See e.g.

	commit a725ee3e44e39dab1ec82cc745899a785d2a555e
	Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
	Date:   Mon Jul 18 15:34:49 2016 -0700

	    virtio-net: Remove more stack DMA



> I would rather fix virtio_net, this looks very suspect to me.


It's been done for years. I'm fine with changing virtio-net and
allocating DMA memory separately but I am not sure it's appropriate on
net.

And OTOH, shouldn't drivers avoid allocating such huge device structs?
Abusing vmalloc won't work well on 32 bit platforms.

> Each virtio_net should probably allocate the exact amount of DMA-memory it wants,
> instead of expecting core networking stack to have a huge chunk of DMA-memory for everything.

It's not a DMA memory at all (not a synchronous memory) and it is not
huge.  It's a small chunk of regular memory that is mapped for DMA for a
short while, then unmapped.

-- 
MST