RE: [PATCH V2 2/2] ARM: dts: imx6sx-sabreauto: add external 24MHz clock source

From: Anson Huang
Date: Wed Apr 18 2018 - 23:23:50 EST




Anson Huang
Best Regards!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Boyd [mailto:sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 11:18 AM
> To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@xxxxxxx>; Shawn Guo
> <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fabio Estevam
> <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>; S.j. Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx>;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] ARM: dts: imx6sx-sabreauto: add external 24MHz
> clock source
>
> Quoting Shawn Guo (2018-04-17 07:22:05)
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:30:45AM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > On i.MX6SX SabreAuto board, there is external 24MHz clock source for
> > > analog clock2, add this clock source to clock tree.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > changes since V1:
> > > remove unnecessary clocks container.
> >
> > I understand this is suggested by Fabio, but I'm afraid that it's not
> > going to work with imx_obtain_fixed_clock() call, which is coded to
> > look for clocks under /clocks node.
> >
>
> Should patch #1 be dropped from clk tree?

If so, I think we should use V1 patch to keep clocks container?

Anson.