Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: prefer SCMI cpufreq if supported

[Viresh Kumar]

On 20-04-18, 10:15, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> It still doesn't give the flexibility to switch between the two
> implementations boot time based on some firmware config(e.g. DT status
> property).

I agree, but it didn't look like they need flexibility :)

Lets see how the intend to use it. If they are *always* going to use SCPI if
that is available, then it should be solved at Kconfig level only. Else they
shouldn't put such code in the driver to quit early.

-- 
viresh