Re: [PATCH v4 10/22] iommu: introduce device fault data

[Jacob Pan]

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:11:41 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <Jean-Philippe.Brucker@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:48:59PM +0100, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * struct iommu_fault_event - Generic per device fault data
> > + *
> > + * - PCI and non-PCI devices
> > + * - Recoverable faults (e.g. page request), information based on
> > PCI ATS
> > + * and PASID spec.
> > + * - Un-recoverable faults of device interest
> > + * - DMA remapping and IRQ remapping faults
> > +
> > + * @type contains fault type.
> > + * @reason fault reasons if relevant outside IOMMU driver, IOMMU
> > driver internal
> > + *         faults are not reported
> > + * @addr: tells the offending page address
> > + * @pasid: contains process address space ID, used in shared
> > virtual memory(SVM)
> > + * @rid: requestor ID  
> 
> You can remove @rid from the comment
> 
thanks, will do.
> > + * @page_req_group_id: page request group index
> > + * @last_req: last request in a page request group
> > + * @pasid_valid: indicates if the PRQ has a valid PASID
> > + * @prot: page access protection flag, e.g. IOMMU_FAULT_READ,
> > IOMMU_FAULT_WRITE
> > + * @device_private: if present, uniquely identify device-specific
> > + *                  private data for an individual page request.
> > + * @iommu_private: used by the IOMMU driver for storing
> > fault-specific
> > + *                 data. Users should not modify this field before
> > + *                 sending the fault response.  
> 
> In my opinion you can remove @iommu_private entirely. I proposed this
> field so that the IOMMU driver can store fault metadata when reporting
> them, and read them back when completing the fault. I'm not using it
> in SMMUv3 anymore (instead re-fetching the metadata) and it can't be
> used anyway, because the value isn't copied into page_response_msg.
> 
In vt-d use, I use private data for preserving vt-d specific fault data
across request and response. e.g. vt-d has streaming response type in
addition to group response (standard). This way, generic code does not
need to know about it.

At device level, since we have to sanitize page response based on
pending page requests, I am doing the private data copy in iommu.c, in
the pending event list. 
> Thanks,
> Jean
> 
> > + */
> > +struct iommu_fault_event {
> > +	enum iommu_fault_type type;
> > +	enum iommu_fault_reason reason;
> > +	u64 addr;
> > +	u32 pasid;
> > +	u32 page_req_group_id;
> > +	u32 last_req : 1;
> > +	u32 pasid_valid : 1;
> > +	u32 prot;
> > +	u64 device_private;
> > +	u64 iommu_private;
> > +};  

[Jacob Pan]