Re: [PATCH v3] kvmalloc: always use vmalloc if CONFIG_DEBUG_SG

[Michal Hocko]

On Tue 24-04-18 13:00:11, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > On Tue 24-04-18 11:50:30, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Mon 23-04-18 20:06:16, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > @@ -404,6 +405,12 @@ void *kvmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t f
> > > > >  	 */
> > > > >  	WARN_ON_ONCE((flags & GFP_KERNEL) != GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > >  
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SG
> > > > > +	/* Catch bugs when the caller uses DMA API on the result of kvmalloc. */
> > > > > +	if (!(prandom_u32_max(2) & 1))
> > > > > +		goto do_vmalloc;
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > 
> > > > I really do not think there is anything DEBUG_SG specific here. Why you
> > > > simply do not follow should_failslab path or even reuse the function?
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_SG is enabled by default in RHEL and Fedora debug kernel (if 
> > > you don't like CONFIG_DEBUG_SG, pick any other option that is enabled 
> > > there).
> > 
> > Are you telling me that you are shaping a debugging functionality basing
> > on what RHEL has enabled? And you call me evil. This is just rediculous.
> > 
> > > Fail-injection framework is if off by default and it must be explicitly 
> > > enabled and configured by the user - and most users won't enable it.
> > 
> > It can be enabled easily. And if you care enough for your debugging
> > kernel then just make it enabled unconditionally.
> 
> So, should we add a new option CONFIG_KVMALLOC_FALLBACK_DEFAULT? I'm not 
> quite sure if 3 lines of debugging code need an extra option, but if you 
> don't want to reuse any existing debug option, it may be possible. Adding 
> it to the RHEL debug kernel would be trivial.

Wouldn't it be equally trivial to simply enable the fault injection? You
would get additional failure paths testing as a bonus.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs