Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config

From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Wed Apr 25 2018 - 10:14:47 EST

Next message: Tycho Andersen: "Re: [PATCH 1/3] big key: get rid of stack array allocation"
Previous message: Yang Shi: "[RFC v5 PATCH] mm: shmem: make stat.st_blksize return huge page size if THP is on"
In reply to: Leo Yan: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config"
Next in thread: Daniel Borkmann: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:25:47PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
>
> If we have concern for security issue, should we remove support for
> 'bpf_jit_enable = 2' and modify the doc to reflect this change?

I suggest to fix the doc.

Next message: Tycho Andersen: "Re: [PATCH 1/3] big key: get rid of stack array allocation"
Previous message: Yang Shi: "[RFC v5 PATCH] mm: shmem: make stat.st_blksize return huge page size if THP is on"
In reply to: Leo Yan: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config"
Next in thread: Daniel Borkmann: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]