Re: [uml-devel] [REVIEW][PATCH 19/22] signal/um: Use force_sig_fault in relay_signal.

[Martin PÃrtel]

>
> Then my analysis is correct that you simply missed filtering out the
> si codes that are not signal specific and do not use the fault layout
> in struct siginfo.
> ...
> I would say that you really need a
> white-list of si_codes that whose use of struct siginfo that you know.
> Otherwise you could get into the same problem of under or over copying
> data.
>

I think that's correct, but I'm not super familiar with either UML or
signal handling.