Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ThunderX2: Add Cavium ThunderX2 SoC UNCORE PMU driver
From: Kim Phillips
Date: Fri Apr 27 2018 - 09:15:35 EST
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:30:27 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:06:24PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:30:47 +0530
> > Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > +static int thunderx2_uncore_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
>
> > This PMU driver can be made more user-friendly by not just silently
> > returning an error code such as -EINVAL, but by emitting a useful
> > message describing the specific error via dmesg.
>
> As has previously been discussed on several occasions, patches which log
> to dmesg in a pmu::event_init() path at any level above pr_debug() are
> not acceptable -- dmesg is not intended as a mechanism to inform users
> of driver-specific constraints.
I disagree - drivers do it all the time, using dev_err(), dev_warn(), etc.
> I would appreciate if in future you could qualify your suggestion with
> the requirement that pr_debug() is used.
It shouldn't - the driver isn't being debugged, it's in regular use.
Thanks,
Kim