Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: btf: silence uninitialize variable warnings

From: Martin KaFai Lau
Date: Fri Apr 27 2018 - 13:18:38 EST


On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:04:09PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that size can be uninitialized if btf_type_id_size()
> returns NULL. It seems reasonable enough to check for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This goes to the BPF tree (linux-next).
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 22e1046a1a86..e631b6fd60d3 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -1229,7 +1229,8 @@ static int btf_array_check_member(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
> }
>
> array_type_id = member->type;
> - btf_type_id_size(btf, &array_type_id, &array_size);
> + if (!btf_type_id_size(btf, &array_type_id, &array_size))
> + return -EINVAL;
This check is not needed. It does not happen for array.

> struct_size = struct_type->size;
> bytes_offset = BITS_ROUNDDOWN_BYTES(struct_bits_off);
> if (struct_size - bytes_offset < array_size) {
> @@ -1351,6 +1352,8 @@ static void btf_array_seq_show(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
>
> elem_type_id = array->type;
> elem_type = btf_type_id_size(btf, &elem_type_id, &elem_size);
> + if (!elem_type)
> + return;
This case has already been checked in verification phase. No need
to recheck everything again..

> elem_ops = btf_type_ops(elem_type);
> seq_puts(m, "[");
> for (i = 0; i < array->nelems; i++) {