Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: vmalloc: Pass proper vm_start into debugobjects
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Apr 30 2018 - 19:04:41 EST
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:13:48 +0530 Chintan Pandya <cpandya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Client can call vunmap with some intermediate 'addr'
> which may not be the start of the VM area. Entire
> unmap code works with vm->vm_start which is proper
> but debug object API is called with 'addr'. This
> could be a problem within debug objects.
As far as I can tell this is indeed the case, but it's a pretty weird
thing for us to do. I wonder if there is any code in the kernel which
is passing such an offset address into vunmap(). If so, perhaps we
should check for it and do a WARN_ONCE so it gets fixed.
> Pass proper start address into debug object API.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1124,15 +1124,15 @@ void vm_unmap_ram(const void *mem, unsigned int count)
> BUG_ON(addr > VMALLOC_END);
> BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr));
>
> - debug_check_no_locks_freed(mem, size);
> -
> if (likely(count <= VMAP_MAX_ALLOC)) {
> + debug_check_no_locks_freed(mem, size);
But this still has the problem you described, no? Shouldn't we be
doing yet another find_vmap_area()?
> vb_free(mem, size);
> return;
> }
>
> va = find_vmap_area(addr);
> BUG_ON(!va);
> + debug_check_no_locks_freed(va->va_start, (va->va_end - va->va_start));
> free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_unmap_ram);
> @@ -1507,8 +1507,8 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
> return;
> }
>
> - debug_check_no_locks_freed(addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
> - debug_check_no_obj_freed(addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
> + debug_check_no_locks_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
> + debug_check_no_obj_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
>
Offtopic: it's a bit sad that __vunmap() does the find_vmap_area() then
calls remove_vm_area() which runs find_vmap_area() yet again...