[PATCH -next] zram: fix printk formats in zram_drv.c

[Randy Dunlap]

From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Fix printk format warnings (seen on i386 build):

../drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:678:4: warning: format â%luâ expects argument of type âlong unsigned intâ, but argument 4 has type âssize_tâ [-Wformat=]
../drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:678:4: warning: format â%luâ expects argument of type âlong unsigned intâ, but argument 5 has type âtime64_tâ [-Wformat=]

time64_t is 64 bits (and signed), so printing it should use %lld,
not %ld.  %ld (long) is only 32 bits on several architectures.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-next-20180503.orig/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ linux-next-20180503/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static ssize_t read_block_state(struct f
 
 		ts = ktime_to_timespec64(zram->table[index].ac_time);
 		copied = snprintf(kbuf + written, count,
-			"%12lu %12lu.%06lu %c%c%c\n",
+			"%12zd %12lld.%06lu %c%c%c\n",
 			index, ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC,
 			zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_SAME) ? 's' : '.',
 			zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_WB) ? 'w' : '.',