Re: pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago)
From: Paul Menzel
Date: Sun May 06 2018 - 05:35:12 EST
Dear Bjorn,
Am 04.05.2018 um 15:33 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas:
[â]
Yes, definitely. I intended to do that but got a little lazy. What
do you think about the following? Paul, if you haven't tested the
first patch, can you try this one instead? The logic is pretty much
the same.
3461a068661c ("PCI: pciehp: Wait for hotplug command completion
lazily") mentions AMD and Nvidia devices with the same issue, but
unfortunately doesn't include any specifics.
commit b0d6f2230e12c85ae3b65a854a53c67c7c1f6406
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu May 3 18:39:38 2018 -0500
PCI: pciehp: Add quirk for Intel Command Completed erratum
The Intel CF118 erratum means the controller does not set the Command
Completed bit unless writes to the Slot Command register change "Control"
bits. Command Completed is never set for writes that only change software
notification "Enable" bits. This results in timeouts like this:
pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago)
When this erratum is present, avoid these timeouts by marking commands
"completed" immediately unless they change the "Control" bits.
Here's the text of the erratum from the Intel document:
CF118 PCIe Slot Status Register Command Completed bit not always
updated on any configuration write to the Slot Control
Register
Problem: For PCIe root ports (devices 0 - 10) supporting hot-plug,
the Slot Status Register (offset AAh) Command Completed
(bit[4]) status is updated under the following condition:
IOH will set Command Completed bit after delivering the new
commands written in the Slot Controller register (offset
A8h) to VPP. The IOH detects new commands written in Slot
Control register by checking the change of value for Power
Controller Control (bit[10]), Power Indicator Control
(bits[9:8]), Attention Indicator Control (bits[7:6]), or
Electromechanical Interlock Control (bit[11]) fields. Any
other configuration writes to the Slot Control register
without changing the values of these fields will not cause
Command Completed bit to be set.
The PCIe Base Specification Revision 2.0 or later describes
the âSlot Control Registerâ in section 7.8.10, as follows
(Reference section 7.8.10, Slot Control Register, Offset
18h). In hot-plug capable Downstream Ports, a write to the
Slot Control register must cause a hot-plug command to be
generated (see Section 6.7.3.2 for details on hot-plug
commands). A write to the Slot Control register in a
Downstream Port that is not hotplug capable must not cause a
hot-plug command to be executed.
The PCIe Spec intended that every write to the Slot Control
Register is a command and expected a command complete status
to abstract the VPP implementation specific nuances from the
OS software. IOH PCIe Slot Control Register implementation
is not fully conforming to the PCIe Specification in this
respect.
Implication: Software checking on the Command Completed status after
writing to the Slot Control register may time out.
Workaround: Software can read the Slot Control register and compare the
existing and new values to determine if it should check the
Command Completed status after writing to the Slot Control
register.
Link: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e7-v2-spec-update.html
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8770820b-85a0-172b-7230-3a44524e6c9f@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index 18a42f8f5dc5..e70eba5ea906 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
* All rights reserved.
*
* Send feedback to <greg@xxxxxxxxx>,<kristen.c.accardi@xxxxxxxxx>
- *
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -147,25 +146,22 @@ static void pcie_wait_cmd(struct controller *ctrl)
else
rc = pcie_poll_cmd(ctrl, jiffies_to_msecs(timeout));
- /*
- * Controllers with errata like Intel CF118 don't generate
- * completion notifications unless the power/indicator/interlock
- * control bits are changed. On such controllers, we'll emit this
- * timeout message when we wait for completion of commands that
- * don't change those bits, e.g., commands that merely enable
- * interrupts.
- */
if (!rc)
ctrl_info(ctrl, "Timeout on hotplug command %#06x (issued %u msec ago)\n",
ctrl->slot_ctrl,
jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - ctrl->cmd_started));
}
+#define CC_ERRATUM_MASK (PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC | \
+ PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC | \
+ PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC | \
+ PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_EIC)
+
static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
u16 mask, bool wait)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
- u16 slot_ctrl;
+ u16 slot_ctrl_orig, slot_ctrl;
mutex_lock(&ctrl->ctrl_lock);
@@ -180,6 +176,7 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
goto out;
}
+ slot_ctrl_orig = slot_ctrl;
slot_ctrl &= ~mask;
slot_ctrl |= (cmd & mask);
ctrl->cmd_busy = 1;
@@ -188,6 +185,17 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
ctrl->cmd_started = jiffies;
ctrl->slot_ctrl = slot_ctrl;
+ /*
+ * Controllers with the Intel CF118 and similar errata advertise
+ * Command Completed support, but they only set Command Completed
+ * if we change the "Control" bits for power, power indicator,
+ * attention indicator, or interlock. If we only change the
+ * "Enable" bits, they never set the Command Completed bit.
+ */
+ if (pdev->broken_cmd_compl &&
+ (slot_ctrl_orig & CC_ERRATUM_MASK) == (slot_ctrl & CC_ERRATUM_MASK))
+ ctrl->cmd_busy = 0;
+
/*
* Optionally wait for the hardware to be ready for a new command,
* indicating completion of the above issued command.
@@ -861,7 +869,7 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_MRLSC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC |
PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC);
- ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot #%d AttnBtn%c PwrCtrl%c MRL%c AttnInd%c PwrInd%c HotPlug%c Surprise%c Interlock%c NoCompl%c LLActRep%c\n",
+ ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot #%d AttnBtn%c PwrCtrl%c MRL%c AttnInd%c PwrInd%c HotPlug%c Surprise%c Interlock%c NoCompl%c LLActRep%c%s\n",
(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PSN) >> 19,
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_ABP),
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PCP),
@@ -872,7 +880,8 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPS),
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_EIP),
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS),
- FLAG(link_cap, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC));
+ FLAG(link_cap, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC),
+ pdev->broken_cmd_compl ? " (with Cmd Compl erratum)" : "");
if (pcie_init_slot(ctrl))
goto abort_ctrl;
@@ -891,3 +900,17 @@ void pciehp_release_ctrl(struct controller *ctrl)
pcie_cleanup_slot(ctrl);
kfree(ctrl);
}
+
+static void quirk_cmd_compl(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ u32 slot_cap;
+
+ if (pci_is_pcie(pdev)) {
+ pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, &slot_cap);
+ if (slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC &&
+ !(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS))
+ pdev->broken_cmd_compl = 1;
+ }
+}
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID,
+ PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, 8, quirk_cmd_compl);
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 73178a2fcee0..60cb5350ad28 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -406,6 +406,9 @@ struct pci_dev {
struct bin_attribute *res_attr[DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE]; /* sysfs file for resources */
struct bin_attribute *res_attr_wc[DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE]; /* sysfs file for WC mapping of resources */
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE
+ unsigned int broken_cmd_compl:1; /* Command Complete broken */
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_PTM
unsigned int ptm_root:1;
unsigned int ptm_enabled:1;
With this change, the message is also not shown anymore on the Lenovo
X60. Thank you.
Tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Kind regards,
Paul