Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> > From 5affbf7e91901143f84f1b2ca64f4afe70e210fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more
> > 
> > Before:
> > 
> >  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(v)			atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
> >  # else
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed		atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire		atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release		atomic_fetch_dec
> >  # endif
> >  #else
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_acquire
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  # endif
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_release
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  # endif
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  # endif
> >  #endif
> > 
> > After:
> > 
> >  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(v)			atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
> >  # else
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed		atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire		atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release		atomic_fetch_dec
> >  # endif
> >  #else
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  # endif
> >  #endif
> > 
> > The idea is that because we already group these APIs by certain defines
> > such as atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed and atomic_fetch_dec in the primary
> > branches - we can do the same in the secondary branch as well.
> > 
> > ( Also remove some unnecessarily duplicate comments, as the API
> >   group defines are now pretty much self-documenting. )
> > 
> > No change in functionality.
> > 
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This breaks compilation on RISC-V. (For some of its atomics, the arch
> currently defines the _relaxed and the full variants and it relies on
> the generic definitions for the _acquire and the _release variants.)

I don't have cross-compilation for RISC-V, which is a relatively new arch.
(Is there any RISC-V set of cross-compilation tools on kernel.org somewhere?)

Could you please send a patch that defines those variants against Linus's tree, 
like the PowerPC patch that does something similar:

  0476a632cb3a: locking/atomics/powerpc: Move cmpxchg helpers to asm/cmpxchg.h and define the full set of cmpxchg APIs

?

... and I'll integrate it into the proper place to make it all bisectable, etc.

Thanks,

	Ingo