Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/rockchip: add transfer function for cdn-dp

From: Enric Balletbo Serra
Date: Mon May 07 2018 - 07:27:33 EST

Next message: Enric Balletbo Serra: "Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/rockchip: support dp training outside dp firmware"
Previous message: Kohli, Gaurav: "Re: [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup"
In reply to: Lin Huang: "[PATCH 3/4] Documentation: bindings: add phy_config for Rockchip USB Type-C PHY"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Lin,

I am interested in these patches, could you cc me on newer versions? Thanks.

Some comments below.

2018-05-04 10:08 GMT+02:00 Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> From: Chris Zhong <zyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We may support training outside firmware, so we need support
> dpcd read/write to get the message or do some setting with
> display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.h | 14 ++++++--
> 4 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>

In general, for this patch and all the other patches in the series I
saw that checkpatch spits out some warnings, could you fix these and
ideally run checkpatch with the --strict --subjective option?

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.c
> index c6fbdcd..268c190 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.c
> @@ -176,8 +176,8 @@ static int cdn_dp_get_sink_count(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u8 *sink_count)
> u8 value;
>
> *sink_count = 0;
> - ret = cdn_dp_dpcd_read(dp, DP_SINK_COUNT, &value, 1);
> - if (ret)
> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&dp->aux, DP_SINK_COUNT, &value, 1);
> + if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> *sink_count = DP_GET_SINK_COUNT(value);
> @@ -374,9 +374,9 @@ static int cdn_dp_get_sink_capability(struct cdn_dp_device *dp)
> if (!cdn_dp_check_sink_connection(dp))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - ret = cdn_dp_dpcd_read(dp, DP_DPCD_REV, dp->dpcd,
> - DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE);
> - if (ret) {
> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&dp->aux, DP_DPCD_REV, dp->dpcd,
> + sizeof(dp->dpcd));
> + if (ret < 0) {
> DRM_DEV_ERROR(dp->dev, "Failed to get caps %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -582,8 +582,8 @@ static bool cdn_dp_check_link_status(struct cdn_dp_device *dp)
> if (!port || !dp->link.rate || !dp->link.num_lanes)
> return false;
>
> - if (cdn_dp_dpcd_read(dp, DP_LANE0_1_STATUS, link_status,
> - DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE)) {
> + if (drm_dp_dpcd_read_link_status(&dp->aux, link_status) !=
> + DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE) {
> DRM_ERROR("Failed to get link status\n");
> return false;
> }
> @@ -1012,6 +1012,40 @@ static int cdn_dp_pd_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
>
> +static ssize_t cdn_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> + struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct cdn_dp_device *dp = container_of(aux, struct cdn_dp_device, aux);
> + int ret;
> + u8 status;
> +
> + switch (msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) {
> + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE:
> + case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE:
> + case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE:
> + ret = cdn_dp_dpcd_write(dp, msg->address, msg->buffer,
> + msg->size);
> + break;
> + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ:
> + case DP_AUX_I2C_READ:
> + ret = cdn_dp_dpcd_read(dp, msg->address, msg->buffer,
> + msg->size);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + status = cdn_dp_get_aux_status(dp);
> + if (status == AUX_STAUS_ACK)
> + msg->reply = DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK;
> + else if (status == AUX_STAUS_NACK)
> + msg->reply = DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_NACK;
> + else if (status == AUX_STAUS_DEFER)
> + msg->reply = DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER;
> +

I think that you would mean STATUS instead of STAUS on these defines.

What happens if the status is AUX_STATUS_SINK_ERROR or AUX_STATUS_BUS_ERROR?

> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int cdn_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
> {
> struct cdn_dp_device *dp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -1030,6 +1064,13 @@ static int cdn_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
> dp->active = false;
> dp->active_port = -1;
> dp->fw_loaded = false;
> + dp->aux.name = "DP-AUX";
> + dp->aux.transfer = cdn_dp_aux_transfer;
> + dp->aux.dev = dev;
> +
> + ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&dp->aux);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> INIT_WORK(&dp->event_work, cdn_dp_pd_event_work);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.h
> index f57e296..46159b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-core.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct cdn_dp_device {
> struct platform_device *audio_pdev;
> struct work_struct event_work;
> struct edid *edid;
> + struct drm_dp_aux aux;
>
> struct mutex lock;
> bool connected;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.c
> index eb3042c..b2f532a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,11 @@ static int cdn_dp_reg_write_bit(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u16 addr,
> sizeof(field), field);
> }
>
> -int cdn_dp_dpcd_read(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr, u8 *data, u16 len)
> +/*
> + * Returns the number of bytes transferred on success, or a negative error
> + * code on failure. -ETIMEDOUT is returned if mailbox message not send success;
> + */

Returns the number of bytes or -ETIMEDOUT, no other negative errors
can be returned, right?

I am not English native but the last phrase sounds incorrect to me,
I'd rephrase it: (open to suggestions)

-ETIMEDOUT if fails to receive the mailbox message.

> +ssize_t cdn_dp_dpcd_read(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr, u8 *data, u16 len)
> {
> u8 msg[5], reg[5];
> int ret;
> @@ -247,24 +251,40 @@ int cdn_dp_dpcd_read(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr, u8 *data, u16 len)
> goto err_dpcd_read;
>
> ret = cdn_dp_mailbox_read_receive(dp, data, len);
> + if (!ret)
> + return len;
>
> err_dpcd_read:
> + DRM_DEV_ERROR(dp->dev, "dpcd read failed: %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> -int cdn_dp_dpcd_write(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr, u8 value)
> +#define CDN_AUX_HEADER_SIZE 5
> +#define CDN_AUX_MSG_SIZE 20
> +/*
> + * Returns the number of bytes transferred on success, or a negative error
> + * code on failure. -ETIMEDOUT is returned if mailbox message not send success;

Same as above. Sounds incorrect to me.

> + * -EINVAL is return if get the wrong data size after message send.

Same here.

> + */
> +ssize_t cdn_dp_dpcd_write(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr, u8 *data, u16 len)
> {
> - u8 msg[6], reg[5];
> + u8 msg[CDN_AUX_MSG_SIZE + CDN_AUX_HEADER_SIZE];
> + u8 reg[CDN_AUX_HEADER_SIZE];
> int ret;
>
> - msg[0] = 0;
> - msg[1] = 1;
> + if (WARN_ON(len > CDN_AUX_MSG_SIZE) || WARN_ON(len <= 0))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + msg[0] = (len >> 8) & 0xff;
> + msg[1] = len & 0xff;
> msg[2] = (addr >> 16) & 0xff;
> msg[3] = (addr >> 8) & 0xff;
> msg[4] = addr & 0xff;
> - msg[5] = value;
> +
> + memcpy(msg + CDN_AUX_HEADER_SIZE, data, len);
> +
> ret = cdn_dp_mailbox_send(dp, MB_MODULE_ID_DP_TX, DPTX_WRITE_DPCD,
> - sizeof(msg), msg);
> + CDN_AUX_HEADER_SIZE + len, msg);
> if (ret)
> goto err_dpcd_write;
>
> @@ -277,8 +297,12 @@ int cdn_dp_dpcd_write(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr, u8 value)
> if (ret)
> goto err_dpcd_write;
>
> - if (addr != (reg[2] << 16 | reg[3] << 8 | reg[4]))
> + if ((len != (reg[0] << 8 | reg[1])) ||
> + (addr != (reg[2] << 16 | reg[3] << 8 | reg[4]))) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + return len;
> + }
>
> err_dpcd_write:
> if (ret)
> @@ -286,6 +310,32 @@ int cdn_dp_dpcd_write(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr, u8 value)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int cdn_dp_get_aux_status(struct cdn_dp_device *dp)
> +{
> + u8 status;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = cdn_dp_mailbox_send(dp, MB_MODULE_ID_DP_TX, DPTX_GET_LAST_AUX_STAUS,
> + 0, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_get_hpd;
> +
> + ret = cdn_dp_mailbox_validate_receive(dp, MB_MODULE_ID_DP_TX,
> + DPTX_GET_LAST_AUX_STAUS, sizeof(status));
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_get_hpd;
> +
> + ret = cdn_dp_mailbox_read_receive(dp, &status, sizeof(status));
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_get_hpd;
> +
> + return status;
> +
> +err_get_hpd:
> + DRM_DEV_ERROR(dp->dev, "get aux status failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int cdn_dp_load_firmware(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, const u32 *i_mem,
> u32 i_size, const u32 *d_mem, u32 d_size)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.h
> index c4bbb4a83..aedf2dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/cdn-dp-reg.h
> @@ -328,6 +328,13 @@
> #define GENERAL_BUS_SETTINGS 0x03
> #define GENERAL_TEST_ACCESS 0x04
>
> +/* AUX status*/
> +#define AUX_STAUS_ACK 0
> +#define AUX_STAUS_NACK 1
> +#define AUX_STAUS_DEFER 2
> +#define AUX_STAUS_SINK_ERROR 3
> +#define AUX_STAUS_BUS_ERROR 4
> +

For the five defines, s/STAUS/STATUS/

> #define DPTX_SET_POWER_MNG 0x00
> #define DPTX_SET_HOST_CAPABILITIES 0x01
> #define DPTX_GET_EDID 0x02
> @@ -469,8 +476,11 @@ int cdn_dp_set_host_cap(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u8 lanes, bool flip);
> int cdn_dp_event_config(struct cdn_dp_device *dp);
> u32 cdn_dp_get_event(struct cdn_dp_device *dp);
> int cdn_dp_get_hpd_status(struct cdn_dp_device *dp);
> -int cdn_dp_dpcd_write(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr, u8 value);
> -int cdn_dp_dpcd_read(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr, u8 *data, u16 len);
> +ssize_t cdn_dp_dpcd_write(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr,
> + u8 *data, u16 len);
> +ssize_t cdn_dp_dpcd_read(struct cdn_dp_device *dp, u32 addr,
> + u8 *data, u16 len);
> +int cdn_dp_get_aux_status(struct cdn_dp_device *dp);
> int cdn_dp_get_edid_block(void *dp, u8 *edid,
> unsigned int block, size_t length);
> int cdn_dp_train_link(struct cdn_dp_device *dp);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Next message: Enric Balletbo Serra: "Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/rockchip: support dp training outside dp firmware"
Previous message: Kohli, Gaurav: "Re: [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup"
In reply to: Lin Huang: "[PATCH 3/4] Documentation: bindings: add phy_config for Rockchip USB Type-C PHY"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]