Re: [RFC PATCH] Add /proc/<pid>/numa_vamaps for numa node information

[Dave Hansen]

On 05/07/2018 04:22 PM, prakash.sangappa wrote:
> However, with the proposed new file, we could allow seeking to
> specified virtual address. The lseek offset in this case would
> represent the virtual address of the process. Subsequent read from
> the file would provide VA range to numa node information starting
> from that VA. In case the VA seek'ed to is invalid, it will start 
> from the next valid mapped VA of the process. The implementation
> would not be based on seq_file.

So you're proposing a new /proc/<pid> file that appears next to and is
named very similarly to the exiting /proc/<pid>, but which has entirely
different behavior?