Re: [PATCH] nubus: Unconditionally register bus type
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue May 08 2018 - 02:32:31 EST
Hi Finn,
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2018, I wrote:
>> On Sun, 6 May 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > > > Why not just have an "bus is registered" flag in your driver
>> > > > register function that refuses to let drivers register with the
>> > > > driver core if it isn't set?
>> > >
>> > > Perhaps that should happen in the core driver_register() function.
>> > > BUG_ON is frowned upon, after all. Would that be acceptable?
>> >
>> > I don't understand what you mean here, perhaps make a patch to show it?
>> >
>>
>> As an alternative to your suggestion (add flag to avoid the BUG_ON):
>>
>> --- a/drivers/base/driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/driver.c
>> @@ -148,7 +148,10 @@ int driver_register(struct device_driver *drv)
>> int ret;
>> struct device_driver *other;
>>
>> - BUG_ON(!drv->bus->p);
>> + if (!drv->bus->p) {
>> + WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot register driver with invalid bus\n");
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + }
>>
>> if ((drv->bus->probe && drv->probe) ||
>> (drv->bus->remove && drv->remove) ||
>>
>
> That rushed example I gave above seems to be confusing the issue. Sorry
> about that. (See sioux-core.c for the code that motivated it.)
>
> This example is the sort of flag removal that I had in mind --
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/driver.c b/drivers/base/driver.c
> index ba912558a510..4ee22fb3db92 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/driver.c
> @@ -148,7 +148,8 @@ int driver_register(struct device_driver *drv)
> int ret;
> struct device_driver *other;
>
> - BUG_ON(!drv->bus->p);
> + if (!drv->bus->p)
> + return -ENODEV;
If this is meant to handle the case where the device driver is registered
before the bus is registered, while the latter can still happen later,
then you want to return -EPROBE_DEFER.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds