Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree

[Minchan Kim]

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:47:54AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/07/2018 07:10 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:39:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 05/03/2018 09:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi Andrew,
> >>>
> >>> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build
> >>> (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >>>
> >>> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: In function 'read_block_state':
> >>> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:674:16: warning: format '%llu' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type '__kernel_time_t {aka long int}' [-Wformat=]
> >>>     "%12lu %12llu.%06lu %c%c%c\n",
> >>>            ~~~~~^
> >>>            %12lu
> >>>     (unsigned long)index, ts.tv_sec,
> >>>                           ~~~~~~~~~
> >>>
> >>> Introduced by commit
> >>>
> >>>   827c7dbda8eb ("zram-introduce-zram-memory-tracking-update-fix-fix")
> >>>
> >>
> >> typedef __s64 time64_t;
> >>
> >> struct timespec64 {
> >> 	time64_t	tv_sec;			/* seconds */
> >> 	long		tv_nsec;		/* nanoseconds */
> >> };
> >>
> >> time64_t is signed. Also, %lu on i386 et al is for 32-bit longs.
> >> I guess that "we" will need to cast ts.tv_sec to (s64) and use %lld to print it
> >> in order to satisfy other $arch.
> >>
> >> Andrew, want to add a fix-fix-fix patch?
> > 
> > Thanks for the fix during I am absent, Andrew and Randy.
> > Here goes fix.
> > Andrew please fold this patchset.
> > 
> > From 16569c7abb641930b4e4ec66b4dc2005e6c87be8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 23:00:16 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH] zram-introduce-zram-memory-tracking-update-fix-fix-fix
> > 
> > fix compile warning
> > 
> > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: In function 'read_block_state':
> > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:674:16: warning: format '%llu' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type '__kernel_time_t {aka long int}' [-Wformat=]
> >     "%12lu %12llu.%06lu %c%c%c\n",
> >            ~~~~~^
> >            %12lu
> >     (unsigned long)index, ts.tv_sec,
> >                           ~~~~~~~~~
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > index f2f3104b2b48..635307e3238b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > @@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ static ssize_t read_block_state(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> >  
> >  		ts = ktime_to_timespec64(zram->table[index].ac_time);
> >  		copied = snprintf(kbuf + written, count,
> > -			"%12lu %12llu.%06lu %c%c%c\n",
> > -			(unsigned long)index, ts.tv_sec,
> > +			"%12lu %12lld.%06ld %c%c%c\n",
> > +			(unsigned long)index, (s64)ts.tv_sec,
> >  			ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC,
> >  			zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_SAME) ? 's' : '.',
> >  			zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_WB) ? 'w' : '.',
> > 
> 
> 	ssize_t index,
> 
> 	so why not print it with %zd (or %12zd) and skip the cast?

Thanks for the suggestion.
Resend.

Andrew, Could you pick up this?