On 1 May 2018 at 07:10, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:10:35AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Document CATU device-tree bindings. CATU augments the TMC-ETR
by providing an improved Scatter Gather mechanism for streaming
trace data to non-contiguous system RAM pages.
Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
index 15ac8e8..cdd84d0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ its hardware characteristcs.
- System Trace Macrocell:
"arm,coresight-stm", "arm,primecell"; [1]
+ - Coresight Address Translation Unit (CATU)
+ "arm, coresight-catu", "arm,primecell";
spurious space ^
* reg: physical base address and length of the register
set(s) of the component.
@@ -86,6 +88,9 @@ its hardware characteristcs.
* arm,buffer-size: size of contiguous buffer space for TMC ETR
(embedded trace router)
+* Optional property for CATU :
+ * interrupts : Exactly one SPI may be listed for reporting the address
+ error
Somewhere you need to define the ports for the CATU.
Example:
@@ -118,6 +123,35 @@ Example:
};
};
+ etr@20070000 {
+ compatible = "arm,coresight-tmc", "arm,primecell";
+ reg = <0 0x20070000 0 0x1000>;
+
+ /* input port */
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ etr_in_port: endpoint {
+ slave-mode;
+ remote-endpoint = <&replicator2_out_port0>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ /* CATU link represented by output port */
+ port@1 {
+ reg = <0>;
While common in the Coresight bindings, having unit-address and reg not
match is an error. Mathieu and I discussed this a bit as dtc now warns
on these.
Either reg should be 1 here, or 'ports' needs to be split into input and
output ports. My preference would be the former, but Mathieu objected to
this not reflecting the the h/w numbering.
Suzuki, as we discuss this is related to your work on revamping CS
bindings for ACPI. Until that gets done and to move forward with this
set I suggest you abide to Rob's request.