Hi Lina,It's an iterator. Hence didn't change this.
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:37:45PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
Allow sleep and wake commands to be cleared from the respective TCSes,
so that they can be re-populated.
Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v7:
- Move bitmap_zero() outside the loop
Changes in v6:
- remove unnecessary locks around __tcs_invalidate
- rename function to tcs_invaldiate
Changes in v4:
- refactored the rphm_rsc_invalidate()
---
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
index 4e2144a14c31..42aedf2d80fe 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -104,6 +104,51 @@ static struct tcs_group *get_tcs_of_type(struct rsc_drv *drv, int type)
return &drv->tcs[type];
}
+static int tcs_invalidate(struct rsc_drv *drv, int type)
+{
+ int m;
nit: use tcs_id?
How do you mean TCS are disabled? I think I asked that question in my mail. Sorry, if I forgot to ask.+ struct tcs_group *tcs;
+
+ tcs = get_tcs_of_type(drv, type);
+ if (IS_ERR(tcs))
+ return PTR_ERR(tcs);
+
+ spin_lock(&tcs->lock);
+ if (bitmap_empty(tcs->slots, MAX_TCS_SLOTS)) {
+ spin_unlock(&tcs->lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ for (m = tcs->offset; m < tcs->offset + tcs->num_tcs; m++) {
+ if (!tcs_is_free(drv, m)) {
+ spin_unlock(&tcs->lock);
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
+ write_tcs_reg_sync(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ENABLE, m, 0);
+ }
+ bitmap_zero(tcs->slots, MAX_TCS_SLOTS);
You didn't reply to (or address) my comment on v6:
It could occur that one or more TCSes are disabled, then tcs_is_free()
returns false for the next TCS and the function returns without having
updated tcs->slots for the TCSes that have been disabled.