Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
From:
J Freyensee
Date:
Tue May 08 2018 - 12:34:13 EST
Next message:
J Freyensee: "Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity"
Previous message:
Stephen Boyd: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts: Add msm8998 SoC and MTP board support"
Next in thread:
Nayna Jain: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
do {
- tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
+ tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL);
I'm just curious why it was decided to still use tpm_msleep() here instead of usleep_range() which was used in the 2nd patch.
Otherwise,
Acked-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
Next message:
J Freyensee: "Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity"
Previous message:
Stephen Boyd: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts: Add msm8998 SoC and MTP board support"
Next in thread:
Nayna Jain: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]