Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the s390 tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Tue, 8 May 2018 10:26:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/s390/net/bpf_jit.S
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   de5cb6eb514e ("s390: use expoline thunks in the BPF JIT")
> 
> from the s390 tree and commit:
> 
>   e1cf4befa297 ("bpf, s390x: remove ld_abs/ld_ind")
> 
> from the bpf-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just removed the file as the latter does) and can
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the net-next and s390 trees.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpkxEL3J8_Mf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature