Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] clk: x86: Add ST oscout platform clock

[Agrawal, Akshu]

On 5/8/2018 9:08 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Agrawal, Akshu
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:04 AM
>> To: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: djkurtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx; mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx>; airlied@xxxxxxxxxx; Liu,
>> Shaoyun <Shaoyun.Liu@xxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] clk: x86: Add ST oscout platform clock
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/8/2018 3:14 AM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Agrawal, Akshu
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 6:14 AM
>>>> Cc: djkurtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@xxxxxxx>;
>>>> Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>;
>>>> mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; Koenig, Christian
>>>> <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx>; airlied@xxxxxxxxxx; Liu, Shaoyun
>>>> <Shaoyun.Liu@xxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>>>> clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>>>> acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] clk: x86: Add ST oscout platform clock
>>>>
>>>> Stoney SoC provides oscout clock. This clock can support 25Mhz and
>>>> 48Mhz of frequency.
>>>> The clock is available for general system use.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: config change, added SPDX tag and used clk_hw_register_.
>>>> v3: Fix kbuild warning for checking of NULL pointer
>>>> v4: unregister clk_hw in driver remove, add .suppress_bind_attrs
>>>>  drivers/clk/x86/Makefile             |  3 +-
>>>>  drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c             | 85
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  include/linux/platform_data/clk-st.h | 17 ++++++++
>>>>  3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)  create mode
>>>> 100644 drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c  create mode 100644
>>>> include/linux/platform_data/clk-st.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile b/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
>>>> index 1367afb..00303bc 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
>>>> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PMC_ATOM)		+= clk-pmc-atom.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE)	+= clk-st.o
>>>>  clk-x86-lpss-objs		:= clk-lpt.o
>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS)	+= clk-x86-lpss.o
>>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_PMC_ATOM)		+= clk-pmc-atom.o
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c new
>>>> file mode
>>>> 100644 index 0000000..8a7795c
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>
>>> Should this be MIT?  The original license was MIT.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>
>> We are adding SPDX tag, while license remains same GPL-2.0
>>
>> What I have read is this is "to provide license identifiers inside the source
>> code that could be easily parsed by machines and would allow checking for
>> license compliance of an open source project easier."
> 
> My point as just that the original license on the file that you first sent out was MIT so the SPDX tag should be MIT rather than GPL.  E.g.,
> SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> 
Oh right it should be MIT, will change it.

Thanks,
Akshu