Re: [PATCH 13/18] wait: wait.h: Get rid of a kernel-doc/Sphinx warnings

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:35:49AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The flow diagram should be inside a code-block to avoid those
> warnings:
> 	./include/linux/wait.h:110: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> 	./include/linux/wait.h:113: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> 	./include/linux/wait.h:115: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> 
> This is easily done by using "::" instead of just ":".

And I'll voice my objection once again. This makes a regular comment
worse. This rst stuff is utter shit for making normal text files less
readable in your favourite text editor.

If this gets merged, I'll simply remove that spurious ':' the next time
I'm near that comment.

> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/wait.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
> index d9f131ecf708..d907ed761a7f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/wait.h
> +++ b/include/linux/wait.h
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ init_waitqueue_func_entry(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry, wait_queue_func_t f
>   * lead to sporadic and non-obvious failure.
>   *
>   * Use either while holding wait_queue_head::lock or when used for wakeups
> - * with an extra smp_mb() like:
> + * with an extra smp_mb() like::
>   *
>   *      CPU0 - waker                    CPU1 - waiter
>   *
> -- 
> 2.17.0
>