Re: [External] [RFC PATCH v1 3/6] mm, zone_type: create ZONE_NVM and fill into GFP_ZONE_TABLE
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Wed May 09 2018 - 07:47:25 EST
On Wed 09-05-18 04:22:10, Huaisheng HS1 Ye wrote:
>
> > On 05/07/2018 07:33 PM, Huaisheng HS1 Ye wrote:
> > > diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> > > index c782e8f..5fe1f63 100644
> > > --- a/mm/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> > > @@ -687,6 +687,22 @@ config ZONE_DEVICE
> > >
> > > +config ZONE_NVM
> > > + bool "Manage NVDIMM (pmem) by memory management (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> > > + depends on NUMA && X86_64
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm curious why this depends on NUMA. Couldn't it be useful in non-NUMA
> > (i.e., UMA) configs?
> >
> I wrote these patches with two sockets testing platform, and there are two DDRs and two NVDIMMs have been installed to it.
> So, for every socket it has one DDR and one NVDIMM with it. Here is memory region from memblock, you can get its distribution.
>
> 435 [ 0.000000] Zone ranges:
> 436 [ 0.000000] DMA [mem 0x0000000000001000-0x0000000000ffffff]
> 437 [ 0.000000] DMA32 [mem 0x0000000001000000-0x00000000ffffffff]
> 438 [ 0.000000] Normal [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x00000046bfffffff]
> 439 [ 0.000000] NVM [mem 0x0000000440000000-0x00000046bfffffff]
> 440 [ 0.000000] Device empty
> 441 [ 0.000000] Movable zone start for each node
> 442 [ 0.000000] Early memory node ranges
> 443 [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000000000001000-0x000000000009ffff]
> 444 [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x00000000a69c2fff]
> 445 [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x00000000a7654000-0x00000000a85eefff]
> 446 [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x00000000ab399000-0x00000000af3f6fff]
> 447 [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x00000000af429000-0x00000000af7fffff]
> 448 [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000043fffffff] Normal 0
> 449 [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000000440000000-0x000000237fffffff] NVDIMM 0
> 450 [ 0.000000] node 1: [mem 0x0000002380000000-0x000000277fffffff] Normal 1
> 451 [ 0.000000] node 1: [mem 0x0000002780000000-0x00000046bfffffff] NVDIMM 1
>
> If we disable NUMA, there is a result as Normal an NVDIMM zones will be overlapping with each other.
> Current mm treats all memory regions equally, it divides zones just by size, like 16M for DMA, 4G for DMA32, and others above for Normal.
> The spanned range of all zones couldn't be overlapped.
No, this is not correct. Zones can overlap.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs