Re: [PATCH] clk: boston: fix memory leak of 'onecell' on error return paths

[Paul Burton]

Hi Colin & Dan,

On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 05:01:35PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:40:31PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > There are several error return paths that don't free up onecell
> > and hence we have some memory leaks. Add an error exit path that
> > kfree's onecell to fix the leaks.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/imgtec/clk-boston.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imgtec/clk-boston.c b/drivers/clk/imgtec/clk-boston.c
> > index 15af423cc0c9..d6bc468ff551 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imgtec/clk-boston.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imgtec/clk-boston.c
> > @@ -73,27 +73,34 @@ static void __init clk_boston_setup(struct device_node *np)
> >  	hw = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "input", NULL, 0, in_freq);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
> >  		pr_err("failed to register input clock: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(hw));
> > -		return;
> > +		goto error;
> 
> I hate vague label names like "error" and "out"...
> 
> There are a bunch of other resources that we should free if we decide
> it's worth freeing things.

Agreed - for example unregistering the clocks that we'd be discarding
references to by freeing onecell.

> Can this even boot without the clk?

Nope. If this clock setup fails then whether you free this memory or not
you're going to be unable to do anything useful with it.

I imagine this patch is the result of some static analysis rather than a
problem being observed at runtime?

Thanks,
    Paul

> When
> the label names says what is freed, then you mentally only have to keep
> track of the most recently allocated resource.  So if
> 
> 	hw = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "input", NULL, 0, in_freq);
> 
> succeeds then the next goto is going to "goto free_clk_input;".
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter