Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches

[Guenter Roeck]

On 05/11/2018 09:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 20:47:27 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:03:46 +0900 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >    
> > > > > I think this is an excellent idea, copying in Stephen for his input.
> > > > > I'm currently on holiday but unless someone convinces me it's a terrible
> > > > > idea I'm willing to at least give it a go on a trial basis once I'm back
> > > > > home.
> > >    
> > > > Since Stephen merges all -fixes branches first, before merging all the
> > > > -next branches, he already generates that as part of linux-next. All
> > > > he'd need to do is push that intermediate state out to some
> > > > linux-fixes branch for consumption by test bots.
> >
> > Good idea ... I will see what I can do.
>
> See my announcement of a pending-fixes branch in linux-next (on LKML
> and others)

Excellent.

Build/test results match mainline.

For v4.17-rc4-241-ga1b6c55:

Build results:
	total: 132 pass: 130 fail: 2
Failed builds:
	m68k:allmodconfig
	xtensa:allmodconfig
Qemu test results:
	total: 138 pass: 138 fail: 0

Guenter