Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Change return type to vm_fault_t

[Dan Williams]

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> It'd be nicer to realign the 2nd and 3rd arguments
>>> on the subsequent lines.
>
>>>
>>>       vm_fault_t (*fault)(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm,
>>>                           struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>                           struct vm_fault *vmf);
>>>
>>
>
>> It'd be nicer if people didn't try to line up arguments at all and
>> just indented by an extra two tabs when they had to break a logical
>> line due to the 80-column limit.
>
> Matthew, there are two different opinions. Which one to take ?

Unfortunately this is one of those "maintainer's choice" preferences
that drives new contributors crazy. Just go with the two tabs like
Matthew said and be done.