Re: [PATCH] cramfs: Fix IS_ENABLED typo

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Sun, 13 May 2018, Joe Perches wrote:

> There's an extra C here...
> 
> Fixes: 99c18ce580c6 ("cramfs: direct memory access support")
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Indeed.

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx>

@Al: could you pick up this one too?


> ---
>  fs/cramfs/inode.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cramfs/inode.c b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> index 017b0ab19bc4..124b093d14e5 100644
> --- a/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static void cramfs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>  {
>  	struct cramfs_sb_info *sbi = CRAMFS_SB(sb);
>  
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CCONFIG_CRAMFS_MTD) && sb->s_mtd) {
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRAMFS_MTD) && sb->s_mtd) {
>  		if (sbi && sbi->mtd_point_size)
>  			mtd_unpoint(sb->s_mtd, 0, sbi->mtd_point_size);
>  		kill_mtd_super(sb);
> 
>