[tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test

[tip-bot for Dave Hansen]

Commit-ID:  6af17cf89e99b64cf1f660bf848755442ab2f047
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/6af17cf89e99b64cf1f660bf848755442ab2f047
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:48 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test

Under the covers, implement executable-only memory with
protection keys when userspace calls mprotect(PROT_EXEC).

But, we did not have a selftest for that.  Now we do.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 083ebd51b44e..8cb4fe58f381 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1303,6 +1303,49 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	expected_pk_fault(pkey);
 }
 
+void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	void *p1;
+	int scratch;
+	int ptr_contents;
+	int ret;
+
+	dprintf1("%s() start\n", __func__);
+
+	p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
+	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+
+	/* Use a *normal* mprotect(), not mprotect_pkey(): */
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_EXEC);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+	dprintf2("pkru: %x\n", rdpkru());
+
+	/* Make sure this is an *instruction* fault */
+	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+	expected_pk_fault(UNKNOWN_PKEY);
+
+	/*
+	 * Put the memory back to non-PROT_EXEC.  Should clear the
+	 * exec-only pkey off the VMA and allow it to be readable
+	 * again.  Go to PROT_NONE first to check for a kernel bug
+	 * that did not clear the pkey when doing PROT_NONE.
+	 */
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("plain read on recently PROT_EXEC area");
+}
+
 void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 {
 	int size = PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -1327,6 +1370,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey) = {
 	test_kernel_gup_of_access_disabled_region,
 	test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region,
 	test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
+	test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory,
 	test_ptrace_of_child,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,