Re: [PATCH 10/12] platform/early: implement support for early platform drivers

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This introduces the core part of support for early platform drivers
> and devices.
>

It looks like most of your prep patches are to separate the alloc and
init of platform devices because you are essentially making early
devices/drivers a sub-class. Maybe you could avoid doing that and
simplify things a bit. Comments below based on doing that...

> +/**
> + * struct early_platform_driver
> + *
> + * @pdrv: real platform driver associated with this early platform driver
> + * @list: list head for the list of early platform drivers
> + * @early_probe: early probe callback
> + */
> +struct early_platform_driver {
> +       struct platform_driver pdrv;
> +       struct list_head list;

Couldn't you use an existing list in driver_private until you move
over to the normal bus infra.

> +       int (*early_probe)(struct platform_device *);

Just add this to platform_driver.

> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct early_platform_device
> + *
> + * @pdev: real platform device associated with this early platform device
> + * @list: list head for the list of early platform devices
> + * @deferred: true if this device's early probe was deferred
> + * @deferred_drv: early platform driver with which this device was matched
> + */
> +struct early_platform_device {
> +       struct platform_device pdev;
> +       struct list_head list;

Use a list in device_private?

> +       bool deferred;
> +       struct early_platform_driver *deferred_drv;

Can't you use the existing deferred probe list?

Rob