Re: [PATCH 18/18] rcu: Use pr_fmt to prefix "rcu: " to logging output

[Randy Dunlap]

On 05/14/2018 01:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 08:45:44AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Use a consistent logging prefix for all rcu related output.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I took parts of this (thank you!) but have concerns about other parts.
> 
>> ---
>>  kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c |  2 ++
>>  kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c       | 10 ++++---
>>  kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c    | 46 +++++++++++++++----------------
>>  kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c      |  2 ++
>>  kernel/rcu/srcutree.c      |  5 +++-
>>  kernel/rcu/tiny.c          |  3 +++
>>  kernel/rcu/tree.c          |  8 +++---
>>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h   | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>  kernel/rcu/update.c        | 19 ++++++++-----
>>  9 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>

>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
>> index 648e1c25707d..45d98ff0d5b8 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>   *
>>   * See also:  Documentation/RCU/torture.txt
>>   */
>> +
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>  #include <linux/init.h>
>> @@ -908,7 +909,7 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
>>  	VERBOSE_TOROUT_STRING("rcu_torture_writer task started");
>>  	if (!can_expedite)
>>  		pr_alert("%s" TORTURE_FLAG
>> -			 " GP expediting controlled from boot/sysfs for %s.\n",
>> +			 " GP expediting controlled from boot/sysfs for %s\n",
>>  			 torture_type, cur_ops->name);
>>
>>  	/* Initialize synctype[] array.  If none set, take default. */
>> @@ -916,27 +917,27 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
>>  		gp_cond1 = gp_exp1 = gp_normal1 = gp_sync1 = true;
>>  	if (gp_cond1 && cur_ops->get_state && cur_ops->cond_sync) {
>>  		synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_COND_GET;
>> -		pr_info("%s: Testing conditional GPs.\n", __func__);
>> +		pr_info("%s: Testing conditional GPs\n", __func__);
>>  	} else if (gp_cond && (!cur_ops->get_state || !cur_ops->cond_sync)) {
>> -		pr_alert("%s: gp_cond without primitives.\n", __func__);
>> +		pr_alert("%s: gp_cond without primitives\n", __func__);
>>  	}
>>  	if (gp_exp1 && cur_ops->exp_sync) {
>>  		synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_EXP_SYNC;
>> -		pr_info("%s: Testing expedited GPs.\n", __func__);
>> +		pr_info("%s: Testing expedited GPs\n", __func__);
>>  	} else if (gp_exp && !cur_ops->exp_sync) {
>> -		pr_alert("%s: gp_exp without primitives.\n", __func__);
>> +		pr_alert("%s: gp_exp without primitives\n", __func__);

Unlike some of the others, the one above is not a sentence, so it doesn't
_need_ a period ... except for consistency.

But I don't care either way. :)

>>  	}
>>  	if (gp_normal1 && cur_ops->deferred_free) {
>>  		synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_DEF_FREE;
>> -		pr_info("%s: Testing asynchronous GPs.\n", __func__);
>> +		pr_info("%s: Testing asynchronous GPs\n", __func__);
>>  	} else if (gp_normal && !cur_ops->deferred_free) {
>> -		pr_alert("%s: gp_normal without primitives.\n", __func__);
>> +		pr_alert("%s: gp_normal without primitives\n", __func__);
>>  	}
>>  	if (gp_sync1 && cur_ops->sync) {
>>  		synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_SYNC;
>> -		pr_info("%s: Testing normal GPs.\n", __func__);
>> +		pr_info("%s: Testing normal GPs\n", __func__);
>>  	} else if (gp_sync && !cur_ops->sync) {
>> -		pr_alert("%s: gp_sync without primitives.\n", __func__);
>> +		pr_alert("%s: gp_sync without primitives\n", __func__);








-- 
~Randy