On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:23:06AM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
index 7e2b7d38a774..fe50986e83c6 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
@@ -323,7 +323,11 @@ static int mipsxx_pmu_alloc_counter(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
static void mipsxx_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *evt, int idx)
{
+ struct perf_event *event = container_of(evt, struct perf_event, hw);
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP
+ unsigned int range = evt->event_base >> 24;
+#endif /* CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP */
WARN_ON(idx < 0 || idx >= mipspmu.num_counters);
@@ -331,11 +335,37 @@ static void mipsxx_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *evt, int idx)
(evt->config_base & M_PERFCTL_CONFIG_MASK) |
/* Make sure interrupt enabled. */
MIPS_PERFCTRL_IE;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BMIPS5000))
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BMIPS5000
+ {
/* enable the counter for the calling thread */
cpuc->saved_ctrl[idx] |=
(1 << (12 + vpe_id())) | BRCM_PERFCTRL_TC;
+ }
+#else
+#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP
+ if (range > V) {
+ /* The counter is processor wide. Set it up to count all TCs. */
+ pr_debug("Enabling perf counter for all TCs\n");
+ cpuc->saved_ctrl[idx] |= M_TC_EN_ALL;
+ } else
+#endif /* CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP */
+ {
+ unsigned int cpu, ctrl;
+ /*
+ * Set up the counter for a particular CPU when event->cpu is
+ * a valid CPU number. Otherwise set up the counter for the CPU
+ * scheduling this thread.
+ */
+ cpu = (event->cpu >= 0) ? event->cpu : smp_processor_id();
+
+ ctrl = M_PERFCTL_VPEID(cpu_vpe_id(&cpu_data[cpu]));
+ ctrl |= M_TC_EN_VPE;
+ cpuc->saved_ctrl[idx] |= ctrl;
+ pr_debug("Enabling perf counter for CPU%d\n", cpu);
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_BMIPS5000 */
I'm not a huge fan of the ifdefery tbh, I don't think it makes it very
easy to read having a combination of ifs and #ifdefs. I reckon
IF_ENABLED would be better, perhaps with having the BMIPS5000 case
return to avoid too much nesting.
Otherwise the patch looks okay to me.
Thanks
James