Re: [PATCH v11 01/26] mm: introduce CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT

[Randy Dunlap]

On 05/17/2018 10:19 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:36:00AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> +	 If the speculative page fault fails because of a concurrency is
>>
>> 	                                     because a concurrency is
> 
> While one can use concurrency as a noun, it sounds archaic to me.  I'd
> rather:
> 
> 	If the speculative page fault fails because a concurrent modification
> 	is detected or because underlying PMD or PTE tables are not yet

Yeah, OK.

>>> +	 detected or because underlying PMD or PTE tables are not yet
>>> +	 allocating, it is failing its processing and a classic page fault
>>
>> 	 allocated, the speculative page fault fails and a classic page fault
>>
>>> +	 is then tried.


-- 
~Randy