Re: [PATCH -tip v3 4/7] kprobes: Ignore break_handler

[Ingo Molnar]

* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ignore break_handler related code because it was only
> used by jprobe and jprobe is removed.

I changed this description to:

 ============
 Subject: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code

 Don't call the ->break_handler() from the core kprobes code, because it was only 
 used by jprobes which got removed.

 ( In a followup patch we'll remove the remaining calls in low level 
   arch handlers as well and remove the callback altogether. )
 ============

Please try to be a lot less vague in changelogs when it's possible and relevant!

I.e. saying "Ignore break_handler related code" is annoyingly vague, it doesn't 
explain things well at all. Saying "Don't call the ->break_handler()" is just as 
compact, yet it also makes it very clear what's done in the patch...

Thanks,

	Ingo