[RFC PATCH 2/6] net: ethernet: ti: cpdma: fit rated channels in backward order

[Ivan Khoronzhuk]

According to TRM tx rated channels should be in 7..0 order,
so correct it.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
index 31ae04117f0a..37fbdc668cc7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
@@ -406,37 +406,36 @@ static int cpdma_chan_fit_rate(struct cpdma_chan *ch, u32 rate,
 	struct cpdma_chan *chan;
 	u32 old_rate = ch->rate;
 	u32 new_rmask = 0;
-	int rlim = 1;
+	int rlim = 0;
 	int i;
 
-	*prio_mode = 0;
 	for (i = tx_chan_num(0); i < tx_chan_num(CPDMA_MAX_CHANNELS); i++) {
 		chan = ctlr->channels[i];
-		if (!chan) {
-			rlim = 0;
+		if (!chan)
 			continue;
-		}
 
 		if (chan == ch)
 			chan->rate = rate;
 
 		if (chan->rate) {
-			if (rlim) {
-				new_rmask |= chan->mask;
-			} else {
-				ch->rate = old_rate;
-				dev_err(ctlr->dev, "Prev channel of %dch is not rate limited\n",
-					chan->chan_num);
-				return -EINVAL;
-			}
-		} else {
-			*prio_mode = 1;
-			rlim = 0;
+			rlim = 1;
+			new_rmask |= chan->mask;
+			continue;
 		}
+
+		if (rlim)
+			goto err;
 	}
 
 	*rmask = new_rmask;
+	*prio_mode = rlim;
 	return 0;
+
+err:
+	ch->rate = old_rate;
+	dev_err(ctlr->dev, "Upper cpdma ch%d is not rate limited\n",
+		chan->chan_num);
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
 static u32 cpdma_chan_set_factors(struct cpdma_ctlr *ctlr,
-- 
2.17.0