Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] perf evlist: Create a new function perf_evlist_forced_leader

From: Jin, Yao
Date: Fri May 18 2018 - 16:34:02 EST




On 5/18/2018 10:18 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:00:32AM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
For non-explicit group, perf report supports a option '--group'
which can enable group output. We also need to support perf annotate
with the same '--group'.

Create a new function perf_evlist_forced_leader which contains
common code to force setting the group leader.

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
index a59281d..6983f6a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
@@ -1795,3 +1795,18 @@ bool perf_evlist__exclude_kernel(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
return true;
}
+
+/*
+ * Events in data file are not collect in groups, but we still want
+ * the group display. Set the artificial group and set the leader's
+ * forced_leader flag to notify the display code.
+ */
+void perf_evlist_forced_leader(struct perf_evlist *evlist)

This should've been:

void perf_evlist__forced_leader(struct perf_evlist *evlist)

But then, by the verb conjugation, I thought that this would be a query,
i.e. "is this a forced leader?", but then, it returning void didn't
match that expectation, which leads me having to actually _read_ that
code to understand what is that this function does, which I would, but
just to check that it matches what it seems to be, now I'm trying to do
it to figure it out what is it that this thing does :-\


I see, its a 'd' to many, this should be:

void perf_evlist__force_leader(struct perf_evlist *evlist)

Please confirm that this is what you intend by posting a v4, so far,
just for this specific patch and any other in the series that uses this
function, ok?

- Arnaldo


Yes, the function is not a query, it's just to setup the forced_leader.

Maybe we can use the name "perf_evlist__setup_forced_leader". But it looks the name is long so the name "perf_evlist__force_leader" is also good.

I will use the name "perf_evlist__force_leader" in v4.

Thanks
Jin Yao



+{
+ if (!evlist->nr_groups) {
+ struct perf_evsel *leader = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
+
+ perf_evlist__set_leader(evlist);
+ leader->forced_leader = true;
+ }
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
index 6c41b2f..d77d514 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
@@ -309,4 +309,7 @@ struct perf_evsel *perf_evlist__event2evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
union perf_event *event);
bool perf_evlist__exclude_kernel(struct perf_evlist *evlist);
+
+void perf_evlist_forced_leader(struct perf_evlist *evlist);
+
#endif /* __PERF_EVLIST_H */
--
2.7.4