Re: [PATCH 3/7] x86/mm: Stop pretending pgtable_l5_enabled is a variable

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 18 May 2018, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:

> pgtable_l5_enabled is defined using cpu_feature_enabled() but we refer
> to it as a variable. This is misleading.
> 
> Make pgtable_l5_enabled() a function.
> 
> We cannot literally define it as a function due to circular dependencies
> between header files. Function-alike macros is close enough.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>