Re: Tasks RCU vs Preempt RCU
From: Joel Fernandes
Date: Sat May 19 2018 - 18:03:30 EST
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 07:29:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:36:23AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was thinking about tasks-RCU and why its needed. Since preempt-RCU allows
> > tasks to be preempted in read-sections, can we not just reuse that mechanism
> > for the trampolines since we track all preempted tasks so we would wait on
> > all tasks preempted within a trampoline?
> >
> > I am trying to understand what will _not_ work if we did that.. I'm guessing
> > the answer is that that would mean the trampoline has to be wrapped with
> > rcu_read_{lock,unlock} which may add some overhead, but please let me know
> > if I'm missing something else..
> >
> > The advantage I guess is possible elimination of an RCU variant, and also
> > possibly eliminating the tasks RCU thread that monitors.. Anyway I was
> > thinking more in terms of the effort of reduction of the RCU flavors etc and
> > reducing complexity ideas.
>
> The problem is that if they are preempted while executing in a trampoline,
> RCU-preempt doesn't queue them nor does it wait on them.
Not if they are wrapped with rcu_read_lock and rcu_read_unlock? From what I
can see, you are preparing a list of blocked tasks that would keep the grace period
from finishing in rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue?
> And the problem with wrapping them with rcu_read_{lock,unlock} is that
> there would be a point before the trampoline executed rcu_read_lock()
> but while it was on the trampoline. Nothing good comes from this. ;-)
Yes, I see what you're saying. The data being protected and freed in this
case is the code so relying on it to do the rcu_read_lock seems infeasible.
Conceptually atleast, I feel this can be fixed by cleverly implementing
trampolines such that the rcu_read_lock isn't done during the trampoline
execution. But I am not very experienced with how the trampolines work to say
definitely whether it is or isn't possible or worth it. But atleast I felt it
was a worthwhile food for thought ;)
I actually want to trace out the trampoline executing as it pertains to RCU,
with your latest rcu/dev.. I think it will be fun :)
thanks!
- Joel