Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] leds: lm3601x: Introduce the lm3601x LED driver

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:44 AM, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx> wrote:


>>> +    child = device_get_next_child_node(&led->client->dev, child);
>>> +    if (!child) {
>>> +        dev_err(&led->client->dev, "No LED Child node\n");
>>> +        return ret;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &led->led_mode);
>>> +    if (ret) {
>>> +        dev_err(&led->client->dev, "reg DT property missing\n");
>>> +        goto out_err;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (led->led_mode > LM3601X_LED_TORCH ||
>>> +        led->led_mode < LM3601X_LED_IR) {
>>> +        dev_warn(&led->client->dev, "Invalid led mode requested\n");
>>> +        ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +        goto out_err;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    ret = fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &name);
>>> +    if (ret) {
>>> +        if (led->led_mode == LM3601X_LED_TORCH)
>>> +            name = "torch";
>>> +        else
>>> +            name = "infrared";
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    snprintf(led->led_name, sizeof(led->led_name),
>>> +        "%s:%s", node->name, name);
>>
>> Reading once again my recent explanation regarding this I realized
>> that I didn't provide clear conclusion, which is: we no longer
>> use child node name for LED class device name if label is absent.
>> (apart from that - you're using parent DT node now, i.e.
>> led-controller).
>>
>> Please follow what was done for drivers/leds/leds-cr0014114.c.
>
> Hmmm.  If this is calling dev->of_node->name to store the name will this
> work in non-DT configurations?

I didn't found this kind of use in linux-next, perhaps I missed something?

In the driver Jacek referred to I found, though, use of of_node, which
at some point should be changed to fwnode.

For now you can fill that if you want to using something like this
(IIRC it should work):

if (is_of_node(fwnode))
 ...->of_node = to_of_node(...);

> I have not dug to deeply into the fwnode code to find out how the nodes
> get populated.  So my question may not even be valid.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko