Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI

[Kees Cook]

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On May 22, 2018, at 5:31 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 5/22/18 1:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:09:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> I think Martin and Christoph are objecting to moving the code to
>>>>> block/scsi_ioctl.h. I don't care too much about where the code is, but
>>>>> think it would be nice to have the definitions in a separate header. But
>>>>> if they prefer just pulling in all of SCSI for it, well then I guess
>>>>> it's pointless to move the header bits. Seems very heavy handed to me,
>>>>> though.
>>>>
>>>> It might be heavy handed for the 3 remaining users of drivers/ide,
>>>
>>> Brutal :-)
>>
>> Heh. I noticed a similar sense buffer use in drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c
>> too. Is this okay under the same considerations?
>
> This is going from somewhat crazy to pretty nuts, imho. I guess in practical terms it doesnât matter that much, since most folks would be using sr. I still think a split would be vastly superior. Just keep the scsi code in drivers/scsi/ and make it independently selectable.

I had originally tied it to BLK_SCSI_REQUEST. Logically speaking,
sense buffers are part of the request, and the CONFIG work is already
done. This is roughly what I tried to do before, since scsi_ioctl.c is
the only code pulled in for CONFIG_BLK_SCSI_REQUEST:

$ git grep BLK_SCSI_REQUEST | grep Makefile
block/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_SCSI_REQUEST)   += scsi_ioctl.o

Should I move to code to a new drivers/scsi/scsi_sense.c and add it to
drivers/scsi/Makefile as:

obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_SCSI_REQUEST)    += scsi_sense.o

Every place I want to use the code is already covered by
CONFIG_BLK_SCSI_REQUEST, so it seems like I just need to know where to
put the .c file. :P

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security