Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] irqchip/irq-mvebu-sei: add new driver for Marvell SEI

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Wed May 23 2018 - 09:12:18 EST

Next message: Michal Hocko: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: do not warn on offline nodes unless the specific node is explicitly requested"
Previous message: Ville SyrjÃlÃ: "[PATCH] drm/modes: Dump the rejected user mode"
In reply to: Miquel Raynal: "[PATCH v2 09/16] irqchip/irq-mvebu-sei: add new driver for Marvell SEI"
Next in thread: Miquel Raynal: "[PATCH v2 14/16] arm64: dts: marvell: add AP806 SEI subnode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 22/05/18 10:40, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> This is a cascaded interrupt controller in the AP806 GIC that collapses
> SEIs (System Error Interrupt) coming from the AP and the CPs (through
> the ICU).
>
> The SEI handles up to 64 interrupts. The first 21 interrupts are wired
> and come from the AP. The next 43 interrupts are from the CPs and are

wired to the AP (no interrupts come from it)

> triggered through MSI messages. To handle this complexity, the driver
> has to declare to the upper layer: one IRQ domain for the wired
> interrupts, one IRQ domain for the MSIs; and acts as a MSI server

s/server/controller/

> ('parent') by declaring an MSI domain.
>
> Suggested-by: Haim Boot <hayim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-sei.c | 422 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 426 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-sei.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index e9233db16e03..922e2a919cf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ config MVEBU_ODMI
> config MVEBU_PIC
> bool
>
> +config MVEBU_SEI
> + bool
> +
> config LS_SCFG_MSI
> def_bool y if SOC_LS1021A || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE
> depends on PCI && PCI_MSI
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 15f268f646bf..69d2ccb454ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_GICP) += irq-mvebu-gicp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_ICU) += irq-mvebu-icu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_ODMI) += irq-mvebu-odmi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_PIC) += irq-mvebu-pic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_SEI) += irq-mvebu-sei.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_SCFG_MSI) += irq-ls-scfg-msi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EZNPS_GIC) += irq-eznps.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-sei.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-sei.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d9abd5e10741
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-sei.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "mvebu-sei: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/msi.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> +/* Cause register */
> +#define GICP_SECR(idx) (0x0 + (idx * 0x4))
> +/* Mask register */
> +#define GICP_SEMR(idx) (0x20 + (idx * 0x4))
> +#define GICP_SET_SEI_OFFSET 0x30
> +
> +#define SEI_IRQ_COUNT_PER_REG 32
> +#define SEI_IRQ_REG_COUNT 2
> +#define SEI_IRQ_COUNT (SEI_IRQ_COUNT_PER_REG * SEI_IRQ_REG_COUNT)
> +#define SEI_IRQ_REG_IDX(irq_id) (irq_id / SEI_IRQ_COUNT_PER_REG)
> +#define SEI_IRQ_REG_BIT(irq_id) (irq_id % SEI_IRQ_COUNT_PER_REG)
> +
> +struct mvebu_sei_interrupt_range {
> + u32 first;
> + u32 number;
> +};
> +
> +struct mvebu_sei {
> + struct device *dev;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct irq_domain *ap_domain;
> + struct irq_domain *cp_domain;
> + struct mvebu_sei_interrupt_range ap_interrupts;
> + struct mvebu_sei_interrupt_range cp_interrupts;
> + /* Lock on MSI allocations/releases */
> + spinlock_t cp_msi_lock;
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(cp_msi_bitmap, SEI_IRQ_COUNT);
> +};
> +
> +static int mvebu_sei_domain_to_sei_irq(struct mvebu_sei *sei,
> + struct irq_domain *domain,
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> + if (domain == sei->ap_domain)
> + return sei->ap_interrupts.first + hwirq;
> + else
> + return sei->cp_interrupts.first + hwirq;
> +}
> +
> +static void mvebu_sei_reset(struct mvebu_sei *sei)
> +{
> + u32 reg_idx;
> +
> + /* Clear IRQ cause registers */
> + for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < SEI_IRQ_REG_COUNT; reg_idx++)
> + writel(0xFFFFFFFF, sei->base + GICP_SECR(reg_idx));
> +}
> +
> +static void mvebu_sei_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_sei *sei = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + u32 sei_irq = mvebu_sei_domain_to_sei_irq(sei, d->domain, d->hwirq);
> + u32 reg_idx = SEI_IRQ_REG_IDX(sei_irq);
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + /* 1 disables the interrupt */
> + reg = readl(sei->base + GICP_SEMR(reg_idx));
> + reg |= BIT(SEI_IRQ_REG_BIT(sei_irq));
> + writel(reg, sei->base + GICP_SEMR(reg_idx));
> +}
> +
> +static void mvebu_sei_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_sei *sei = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + u32 sei_irq = mvebu_sei_domain_to_sei_irq(sei, d->domain, d->hwirq);
> + u32 reg_idx = SEI_IRQ_REG_IDX(sei_irq);
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + /* 0 enables the interrupt */
> + reg = readl(sei->base + GICP_SEMR(reg_idx));
> + reg &= ~BIT(SEI_IRQ_REG_BIT(sei_irq));
> + writel(reg, sei->base + GICP_SEMR(reg_idx));
> +}
> +
> +static void mvebu_sei_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data,
> + struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_sei *sei = data->chip_data;
> + phys_addr_t set = sei->res->start + GICP_SET_SEI_OFFSET;
> +
> + msg->data = mvebu_sei_domain_to_sei_irq(sei, data->domain, data->hwirq);
> + msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(set);
> + msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(set);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip mvebu_sei_ap_wired_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "AP wired SEI",
> + .irq_mask = mvebu_sei_mask_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = mvebu_sei_unmask_irq,
> + .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
> + .irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
> + .irq_set_type = irq_chip_set_type_parent,

You seem to assume that this driver is purely dealing with edge
interrupts. And yet you pass the request directly to the parrent. What
does it mean? Shouldn't you at least check that this is an edge request
and fail otherwise?

> +};
> +
> +static struct irq_chip mvebu_sei_cp_msi_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "CP MSI SEI",
> + .irq_mask = mvebu_sei_mask_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = mvebu_sei_unmask_irq,
> + .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
> + .irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
> + .irq_set_type = irq_chip_set_type_parent,

Same here.

> + .irq_compose_msi_msg = mvebu_sei_compose_msi_msg,
> +};
> +
> +static int mvebu_sei_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs,
> + void *args)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_sei *sei = domain->host_data;
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = args;
> + struct irq_chip *irq_chip;
> + int sei_hwirq, hwirq;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Software only supports single allocations for now */
> + if (nr_irqs != 1)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (domain == sei->ap_domain) {

That's not great, really. Pushing the management of the two domains into
the same callbacks is pretty ugly, and makes the code rather confusing.
Is there anything really preventing the two domains from being managed
independently?

> + irq_chip = &mvebu_sei_ap_wired_irq_chip;
> + hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
> + } else {
> + irq_chip = &mvebu_sei_cp_msi_irq_chip;
> + spin_lock(&sei->cp_msi_lock);

This could as well be a mutex.

> + hwirq = bitmap_find_free_region(sei->cp_msi_bitmap,
> + SEI_IRQ_COUNT, 0);

It is a bit weird that you're allocating from a 64bit bitmap while you
only have 43 interrupts available... At the 44th interrupt, something
bad is going to happen.

> + spin_unlock(&sei->cp_msi_lock);
> + if (hwirq < 0)
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
> +
> + sei_hwirq = mvebu_sei_domain_to_sei_irq(sei, domain, hwirq);

Splitting the callbacks would definitely avoid that kind of horror.

> +
> + fwspec->fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
> + fwspec->param_count = 3;
> + fwspec->param[0] = GIC_SPI;
> + fwspec->param[1] = sei_hwirq;
> + fwspec->param[2] = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
> +
> + ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs, fwspec);
> + if (ret)
> + goto release_region;
> +
> + ret = irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq, hwirq, irq_chip, sei);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_irq_parents;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +free_irq_parents:
> + irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
> +release_region:
> + if (domain == sei->cp_domain) {
> + spin_lock(&sei->cp_msi_lock);
> + bitmap_release_region(sei->cp_msi_bitmap, hwirq, 0);
> + spin_unlock(&sei->cp_msi_lock);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void mvebu_sei_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_sei *sei = domain->host_data;
> + struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> + u32 irq_nb = sei->ap_interrupts.number + sei->cp_interrupts.number;
> +
> + if (nr_irqs != 1 || d->hwirq >= irq_nb) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Invalid hwirq %lu\n", d->hwirq);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
> +
> + spin_lock(&sei->cp_msi_lock);
> + bitmap_release_region(sei->cp_msi_bitmap, d->hwirq, 0);
> + spin_unlock(&sei->cp_msi_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops mvebu_sei_ap_domain_ops = {
> + .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onecell,
> + .alloc = mvebu_sei_irq_domain_alloc,
> + .free = mvebu_sei_irq_domain_free,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops mvebu_sei_cp_domain_ops = {
> + .alloc = mvebu_sei_irq_domain_alloc,
> + .free = mvebu_sei_irq_domain_free,
> +};
> +
> +static struct irq_chip mvebu_sei_msi_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "SEI",
> + .irq_set_type = irq_chip_set_type_parent,

Same question here.

> +};
> +
> +static struct msi_domain_ops mvebu_sei_msi_ops = {
> +};
> +
> +static struct msi_domain_info mvebu_sei_msi_domain_info = {
> + .flags = MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS,
> + .ops = &mvebu_sei_msi_ops,
> + .chip = &mvebu_sei_msi_irq_chip,
> +};
> +
> +static void mvebu_sei_handle_cascade_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_sei *sei = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + unsigned long irqmap, irq_bit;
> + u32 reg_idx, virq, irqn;
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + /* Read both SEI cause registers (64 bits) */
> + for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < SEI_IRQ_REG_COUNT; reg_idx++) {
> + irqmap = readl_relaxed(sei->base + GICP_SECR(reg_idx));
> +
> + /* Call handler for each set bit */
> + for_each_set_bit(irq_bit, &irqmap, SEI_IRQ_COUNT_PER_REG) {
> + /* Cause Register gives the SEI number */
> + irqn = irq_bit + reg_idx * SEI_IRQ_COUNT_PER_REG;
> + /*
> + * Finding Linux mapping (virq) needs the right domain
> + * and the relative hwirq (which start at 0 in both
> + * cases, while irqn is relative to all SEI interrupts).
> + */

It is a bit odd that you're virtualizing the hwirq number. The whole
point of splitting hwirq from virq is that you don't have to do that and
can use the the raw HW number. You're saving a tiny bit of memory in the
irq_domain, at the expense of more complexity. I don't know if that's
worth it...

> + if (irqn < sei->ap_interrupts.number) {
> + virq = irq_find_mapping(sei->ap_domain, irqn);
> + } else {
> + irqn -= sei->ap_interrupts.number;
> + virq = irq_find_mapping(sei->cp_domain, irqn);
> + }
> +
> + /* Call IRQ handler */
> + generic_handle_irq(virq);
> + }
> +
> + /* Clear interrupt indication by writing 1 to it */
> + writel(irqmap, sei->base + GICP_SECR(reg_idx));
> + }
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static int mvebu_sei_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node, *parent, *child;
> + struct irq_domain *parent_domain, *plat_domain;
> + struct mvebu_sei *sei;
> + const __be32 *property;
> + u32 parent_irq, size;
> + int ret;
> +
> + sei = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sei), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sei)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sei->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&sei->cp_msi_lock);
> +
> + sei->res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + sei->base = devm_ioremap_resource(sei->dev, sei->res);
> + if (!sei->base) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Failed to remap SEI resource\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + mvebu_sei_reset(sei);
> +
> + /*
> + * Reserve the single (top-level) parent SPI IRQ from which all the
> + * interrupts handled by this driver will be signaled.
> + */
> + parent_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> + if (parent_irq <= 0) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Failed to retrieve top-level SPI IRQ\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler(parent_irq, mvebu_sei_handle_cascade_irq);
> + irq_set_handler_data(parent_irq, sei);
> +
> + /*
> + * SEIs in the range [ 0; 20] are wired and come from the AP.
> + * SEIs in the range [21; 63] are CP SEI and are triggered through MSIs.
> + *
> + * Each SEI 'domain' is represented as a subnode.
> + */
> +
> + /* Get a reference to the parent domain to create a hierarchy */
> + parent = of_irq_find_parent(node);
> + if (!parent) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Failed to find parent IRQ node\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto dispose_irq;
> + }
> +
> + parent_domain = irq_find_host(parent);
> + if (!parent_domain) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Failed to find parent IRQ domain\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto dispose_irq;
> + }
> +
> + /* Create the 'wired' hierarchy */
> + child = of_find_node_by_name(node, "sei-wired-controller");
> + if (!child) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Missing 'sei-wired-controller' subnode\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto dispose_irq;
> + }
> +
> + property = of_get_property(child, "marvell,sei-ranges", &size);
> + if (!property || size != (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Missing 'marvell,sei-ranges' property\n");
> + of_node_put(child);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto dispose_irq;
> + }
> +
> + sei->ap_interrupts.first = be32_to_cpu(property[0]);
> + sei->ap_interrupts.number = be32_to_cpu(property[1]);
> + sei->ap_domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(parent_domain, 0,
> + sei->ap_interrupts.number,
> + of_node_to_fwnode(child),
> + &mvebu_sei_ap_domain_ops,
> + sei);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + if (!sei->ap_domain) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Failed to create AP IRQ domain\n");
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto dispose_irq;
> + }
> +
> + /* Create the 'MSI' hierarchy */
> + child = of_find_node_by_name(node, "sei-msi-controller");
> + if (!child) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Missing 'sei-msi-controller' subnode\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto remove_ap_domain;
> + }
> +
> + property = of_get_property(child, "marvell,sei-ranges", &size);
> + if (!property || size != (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
> + dev_err(sei->dev, "Missing 'marvell,sei-ranges' property\n");
> + of_node_put(child);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto remove_ap_domain;
> + }
> +
> + sei->cp_interrupts.first = be32_to_cpu(property[0]);
> + sei->cp_interrupts.number = be32_to_cpu(property[1]);
> + sei->cp_domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(parent_domain, 0,
> + sei->cp_interrupts.number,
> + of_node_to_fwnode(child),
> + &mvebu_sei_cp_domain_ops,
> + sei);
> + if (!sei->cp_domain) {
> + pr_err("Failed to create CPs IRQ domain\n");
> + of_node_put(child);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto remove_ap_domain;
> + }
> +
> + plat_domain = platform_msi_create_irq_domain(of_node_to_fwnode(child),
> + &mvebu_sei_msi_domain_info,
> + sei->cp_domain);
> + of_node_put(child);
> + if (!plat_domain) {
> + pr_err("Failed to create CPs MSI domain\n");
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto remove_cp_domain;
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sei);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +remove_cp_domain:
> + irq_domain_remove(sei->cp_domain);
> +remove_ap_domain:
> + irq_domain_remove(sei->ap_domain);
> +dispose_irq:
> + irq_dispose_mapping(parent_irq);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id mvebu_sei_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "marvell,armada-8k-sei", },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver mvebu_sei_driver = {
> + .probe = mvebu_sei_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "mvebu-sei",
> + .of_match_table = mvebu_sei_of_match,
> + },
> +};
> +builtin_platform_driver(mvebu_sei_driver);
>

It feels like this patch could do with a total split:

- Introduce the wired side of the driver
- then the MSI part

Drop the common domain callbacks, and treat the two domains separately.
I seriously doubt there will be much of an overlap anyway.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Next message: Michal Hocko: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: do not warn on offline nodes unless the specific node is explicitly requested"
Previous message: Ville SyrjÃlÃ: "[PATCH] drm/modes: Dump the rejected user mode"
In reply to: Miquel Raynal: "[PATCH v2 09/16] irqchip/irq-mvebu-sei: add new driver for Marvell SEI"
Next in thread: Miquel Raynal: "[PATCH v2 14/16] arm64: dts: marvell: add AP806 SEI subnode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]