Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] dax: report bytes remaining in dax_iomap_actor()

[Dan Williams]

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 05:06:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> In preparation for protecting the dax read(2) path from media errors
>> with copy_to_iter_mcsafe() (via dax_copy_to_iter()), convert the
>> implementation to report the bytes successfully transferred.
>>
>> Cc: <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/dax.c |   20 +++++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
>> index a64afdf7ec0d..34a2d435ae4b 100644
>> --- a/fs/dax.c
>> +++ b/fs/dax.c
>> @@ -991,6 +991,7 @@ dax_iomap_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, void *data,
>>       struct iov_iter *iter = data;
>>       loff_t end = pos + length, done = 0;
>>       ssize_t ret = 0;
>> +     size_t xfer;
>>       int id;
>>
>>       if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) {
>> @@ -1054,19 +1055,20 @@ dax_iomap_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, void *data,
>>                * vfs_write(), depending on which operation we are doing.
>>                */
>>               if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
>> -                     map_len = dax_copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
>> +                     xfer = dax_copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
>>                                       map_len, iter);
>>               else
>> -                     map_len = dax_copy_to_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
>> +                     xfer = dax_copy_to_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
>>                                       map_len, iter);
>> -             if (map_len <= 0) {
>> -                     ret = map_len ? map_len : -EFAULT;
>> -                     break;
>> -             }
>>
>> -             pos += map_len;
>> -             length -= map_len;
>> -             done += map_len;
>> +             pos += xfer;
>> +             length -= xfer;
>> +             done += xfer;
>> +
>> +             if (xfer == 0)
>> +                     ret = -EFAULT;
>> +             if (xfer < map_len)
>> +                     break;
>
> I'm confused by this error handling.  So if we hit an error on a given iov and
> we don't transfer the expected number of bytes, we have two cases:
>
> 1) We transferred *something* on this iov but not everything - return success.
> 2) We didn't transfer anything on this iov - return -EFAULT.
>
> Both of these are true regardless of data transferred on previous iovs.
>
> Why the distinction?  If a given iov is interrupted, regardless of whether it
> transferred 0 bytes or 1, shouldn't the error path be the same?

This is is the semantics of read(2) / write(2). Quoting the pwrite man page:

       Note that is not an error for  a  successful  call  to
transfer  fewer  bytes  than
       requested (see read(2) and write(2)).