Re: semantics of rhashtable and sysvipc

From: Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Wed May 23 2018 - 12:58:39 EST

Next message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: B53 DSA switch problem on Banana Pi-R1 on Fedora 26"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 3/8] md: raid5: use refcount_t for reference counting instead atomic_t"
In reply to: Davidlohr Bueso: "semantics of rhashtable and sysvipc"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: semantics of rhashtable and sysvipc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 23 May 2018, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

I see two possible fixes.

I guess a third option would be to make the hashtable static, but I'm not
against using rhashtables so I'm not really considering this.

Next message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: B53 DSA switch problem on Banana Pi-R1 on Fedora 26"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 3/8] md: raid5: use refcount_t for reference counting instead atomic_t"
In reply to: Davidlohr Bueso: "semantics of rhashtable and sysvipc"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: semantics of rhashtable and sysvipc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]