Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] usb: roles: intel_xhci: Always allow user control
From: Heikki Krogerus
Date: Thu May 24 2018 - 01:10:07 EST
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 08:03:43PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23-05-18 16:37, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Trying to determine the USB port type with this mux is very
> > difficult. To simplify the situation, always allowing user
> > control, even if the port is USB Type-C port.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../usb/roles/intel-xhci-usb-role-switch.c | 21 +------------------
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/roles/intel-xhci-usb-role-switch.c b/drivers/usb/roles/intel-xhci-usb-role-switch.c
> > index 30b07ea3a3c6..3f14153d753f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/roles/intel-xhci-usb-role-switch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/roles/intel-xhci-usb-role-switch.c
> > @@ -39,20 +39,6 @@ struct intel_xhci_usb_data {
> > void __iomem *base;
> > };
> > -struct intel_xhci_acpi_match {
> > - const char *hid;
> > - int hrv;
> > -};
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * ACPI IDs for PMICs which do not support separate data and power role
> > - * detection (USB ACA detection for micro USB OTG), we allow userspace to
> > - * change the role manually on these.
> > - */
> > -static const struct intel_xhci_acpi_match allow_userspace_ctrl_ids[] = {
> > - { "INT33F4", 3 }, /* X-Powers AXP288 PMIC */
> > -};
> > -
> > static int intel_xhci_usb_set_role(struct device *dev, enum usb_role role)
> > {
> > struct intel_xhci_usb_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > @@ -139,6 +125,7 @@ static enum usb_role intel_xhci_usb_get_role(struct device *dev)
> > static struct usb_role_switch_desc sw_desc = {
> > .set = intel_xhci_usb_set_role,
> > .get = intel_xhci_usb_get_role,
> > + .allow_userspace_control = true,
> > };
> > static int intel_xhci_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>
> I hate to be pedantic here, but the sw_desc can and should be made
> const now, with that fixed the entire series is:
Sure, I'll fix that.
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Hans. I'll send the v3. I need to add one more fix to the
series.
I got a report where somebody hit the issue related to the runtime PM
we talked about a while back: If xHCI is suspended, we fail to program
the mux registers as they are part of xHCI MMIO, so I will add a patch
to this series where I enable runtime PM here to fix that problem.
Cheers,
--
heikki